We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse the International Law Office website, we will assume you are happy to receive all of our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Supreme Court Rules that Statutory Auditors Can Act Independently - International Law Office

International Law Office

Company & Commercial - South Korea

Supreme Court Rules that Statutory Auditors Can Act Independently

May 06 2003


Under the Commercial Code a joint stock company, which is the most common type of corporation in Korea, must have at least one statutory auditor. The statutory auditor is intended to act as a watchdog for company shareholders and is empowered not only to audit the company's books and records, but also to inspect the conduct of its directors. Most local companies have only one statutory auditor, but many foreign-invested joint venture companies have two, appointed by each joint venture partner.

According to prevailing opinion, if there are multiple statutory auditors, each statutory auditor can act independently and not jointly. Until recently, the position of the judiciary on this matter was unclear. However, the Supreme Court has now issued a decision on the issue.

In the case, one of two statutory auditors of a company filed a lawsuit on behalf of the company against its representative director, seeking damages for his wrongdoing. Under the Commercial Code the statutory auditor is empowered to represent the company in lawsuits against directors of the company, including representative directors. Subsequently, however, the company’s other statutory auditor unilaterally withdrew the lawsuit without the consent of the statutory auditor who had filed it. The key issue was the validity of such withdrawal.

The lower court held that the lawsuit was validly ended by the withdrawal, but added that the company could seek damages against the second statutory auditor if the withdrawal was made as a result of an unlawful collaboration between it and the representative director. The Supreme Court agreed, declaring that each statutory auditor can act independently on behalf of the company.

In light of the ruling, any party to a joint venture agreement or shareholder agreement with respect to a Korean joint venture company should consider carefully the advantages and disadvantages of having two statutory auditors and may wish to insist on the company having only one. In the worst-case scenario, an action taken by a statutory auditor designated by one joint venture partner in order to protect his or her interests may be withdrawn or invalidated by a statutory auditor designated by the other joint venture partner, against whose interests the original action was taken.


For further information on this topic please contact Hee Chul Kang at Woo Yun Kang Jeong & Han by telephone (+822 528 5200) or by fax (+822 528 5300) or by email (hckang@wooyun.co.kr).



Comment or question for author

ILO provides online commentaries as specialist Legal Newsletters. Written in collaboration with over 500 of the world's leading experts and covering more than 100 jurisdictions, it delivers individually requested information via email to an influential global audience of law firm partners and international corporate counsel. Please click here to register for the service.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription. Register at www.iloinfo.com.