August 16 2012
The Competition Commission has filed an application to appeal the Competition Appeal Court's judgment in the Pannar Seed (Proprietary) Limited and Pioneer Hi-Bred International Incorporated merger with the Supreme Court of Appeal. The commission is challenging the Competition Appeal Court's judgment on two grounds: the approval of the merger and the costs order awarded against the commission.
In May 2011 the Competition Appeal Court overturned the commission's prohibition of the merger between Pannar Seed and Pioneer. The Competition Appeal Court held that the proposed transaction would benefit competition in the industry by preventing the inevitable demise of Pannar Seed.
A spokesperson for the commission indicated that the organisation is seeking clarity from the Supreme Court of Appeal as to when the 'failing firm' defence may be used in merger transactions. The spokesperson also stated that an order for the commission to pay legal costs, incurred in the Competition Tribunal and the Supreme Court of Appeal reviews, undermines its investigatory powers.
ILO provides online commentaries as specialist Legal Newsletters. Written in collaboration with over 500 of the world's leading experts and covering more than 100 jurisdictions, it delivers individually requested information via email to an influential global audience of law firm partners and international corporate counsel. Please click here to register for the service.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription. Register at www.iloinfo.com.