July 06 2012
Introduction
Facts
Lessons from Coeur Défense
The real estate market is dealing with two major requirements:
An increasing number of real estate lenders are reluctant to make investments and provide financing and refinancing, and much of this reluctance seems to have stemmed from the Supreme Court's decision in Coeur Défense, which lenders believe shows favouritism to debtors under French law to the detriment of financial institutions.
In addition, a high level of debt is due to mature during 2012 and banks need to reduce their commitments because their debt-to-equity ratio is excessive.
However, debtors are not as favoured under French law as it may appear. Thus, foreign real estate players need to be aware that there are legal means of protection available to them in case of debtors' default and bad faith.
Joint stock company Heart of La Defense (HOLD), whose capital is wholly owned by a holding company, Dame Luxembourg, acquired the Coeur Défense office building for rental through a real estate partnership.
Having financial difficulties, HOLD and Dame Luxembourg filed a petition to open reorganisation proceedings under insolvency legislation. The initial court decision was favourable to the lenders, holding that:
On March 8 2011 the Supreme Court upheld the appeal, and asked the Versailles Court of Appeal to reconsider the case (10-13.988). On January 19 2012 the Versailes Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the debtor (11/03519).
Both courts stated that the opening of reorganisation proceedings cannot be denied if the debtor demonstrates difficulties that it is unable to overcome and which are likely to result in it defaulting on payments (eg, mortgage or rental payments). Creditors cannot be protected from the opening of reorganisation proceedings for a French company owning a building in France simply through the establishment of a special purpose entity located in another European jurisdiction.
In light of Coeur Défense, players on the real estate market should consider overcoming the issues raised in the case by reversing the 'normal' financing package - that is, the subsidiary becomes the lender and the parent company grants the guarantee.
Under this method, the holding company borrows to finance its subsidiary by capital contribution and by one or more loans. Collateral and guarantees are granted to both the holding company and the subsidiary:
For further information on this topic please contact Sarah Lugan or Jean-Christophe Bouchard at NMW avocats by telephone (+33 1 83 62 54 54) or email (slugan@nmwavocats.com or jcbouchard@nmwavocats.com).
Comment or question for author
ILO provides online commentaries as specialist Legal Newsletters. Written in collaboration with over 500 of the world's leading experts and covering more than 100 jurisdictions, it delivers individually requested information via email to an influential global audience of law firm partners and international corporate counsel. Please click here to register for the service.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription. Register at www.iloinfo.com.