Michael Lips, Certified Specialist SBA Construction and Real Estate Law, is partner and head of Pestalozzi's Real Estate and Environment practice group. He has long-standing experience in real estate, environmental and public procurement law. For years, he has been working exclusively in this field, handling numerous transactions, contracts, public procurement and regulatory matters. He frequently represents clients before Swiss courts. He is recognized by Chambers, Legal 500 and others.
Michael Lips' fields of expertise include commercial and residential leases, sales, pledges and encumbrances of real properties, building and other work contracts, real estate transactions including public private partnerships and all types of environmental issues. Michael Lips advises domestic and international business and private clients. He frequently advises on compliance and other regulatory matters such as the acquisition of real properties by non-Swiss residents and rural land rights. In public procurement law, Michael Lips regularly advises public authorities throughout the entire procurement process and related court litigation. He also advises bidders in preparing tenders and in related litigation. Michael Lips frequently publishes in his fields of expertise.
Michael Lips graduated from the Zurich University (lic.iur., 1997; Dr. iur., 2003) and from the University of Virginia (LL.M., 2004). He served at the District Court of Meilen for two years. Michael Lips was admitted to the bar in 2001 and joined Pestalozzi in 2002. In 2016, he obtained the Certificate of Advanced Studies (CAS) Construction and Real Estate Law from Fribourg University. Since 2017, he is a Certified Specialist SBA Construction and Real Estate Law.
Swiss voters recently adopted a revised Energy Act. The new law includes extensive measures to reduce energy consumption, increase energy efficiency and promote renewable energy. In particular, the revised act aims to promote energy from water, sun, wind and geothermic energy produced in Switzerland. Existing hydroelectric power plants will temporarily obtain subsidies and the construction of new nuclear power plants will be prohibited.
This article summarises key amendments to Swiss environmental laws which either came into effect recently or will come into effect in the foreseeable future. These include efforts to reduce CO2 emissions, the decision to revert to the original scale system for energy labels, the modification of Annex 1 of the Prior Informed Consent Ordinance and the introduction of new regulations for the export of certain hazardous plant protection products which may endanger human health or the environment.
Swiss voters recently rejected a popular initiative that aimed to tighten the responsibilities of Swiss-based companies with respect to their global activities. One key element of the initiative was the introduction of a legal obligation on Swiss-based multinationals to respect international environmental standards. Both the federal government and Parliament considered the initiative to be too far reaching. Therefore, Parliament has presented a counter-proposal that will enter into force if no referendum is held.
The Swiss emissions trading system (ETS) is an important market-based instrument for climate protection. It serves to reduce the volume of greenhouse gases produced by Swiss companies with particularly high emissions. Since 21 September 2020, Switzerland and the European Union have enabled emissions allowance transactions between the Swiss ETS and the EU ETS.
The Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communication recently launched the consultation process for a partial revision of the CO2 Ordinance. Amendments to the ordinance are necessary to extend certain climate protection measures until the end of 2021, as recently decided by Parliament.
This article summarises key amendments to Swiss environmental laws which either came into effect in recent months or will come into effect in the foreseeable future. Recent developments in this area concern, among other things, CO2 emissions, waste and recycling, contaminated site and soil protection, genetic engineering and new statutory limitation periods.
In 2016 the so-called 'Responsible Business Initiative' was submitted to the Swiss Federal Chancellery. A key element of the initiative is the introduction of a legal obligation on Swiss-based multinationals to respect international environmental standards in all of their business activities worldwide. As the popular vote on the initiative is expected to take place in February 2020, Swiss-based companies should analyse whether they may be affected and, if so, determine appropriate implementation measures.
This article summarises key amendments to Swiss environmental laws which either came into effect in recent months or will come into effect in the foreseeable future. Recent developments in this area affect, among other things, plant and water protection, chemicals, non-ionising radiation, energy and CO2 reduction.
While the Federal Act on the Reduction of CO2 Emissions (CO2 Act) has had some success in reducing CO2 emissions, the average CO2 emissions of passenger cars have increased in recent years. As the existing law cannot sufficiently meet the ambitious goals of the Paris Convention, Parliament should agree on a revised CO2 Act that can provide for appropriate instruments to reach these goals.
The Federal Supreme Court recently ruled on the allocation of clean-up costs where certain polluters are exempt from liability. For the first time, the court discussed the question of whether a contaminated site owner's exemption from liability leads to a corresponding additional burden on the polluter which, through its own conduct, caused the clean-up measures or whether the additional burden passes to the canton and the municipality.
Various amendments to Swiss environmental statutes and ordinances have recently entered into effect or will come into effect in the foreseeable future. These new measures include certain amendments to the Energy Act, the Water Protection Ordinance, the Ordinance on the Prevention and the Disposal of Waste and the Ordinance on Protection against Major Accidents.
The Federal Council recently published its dispatch regarding the total revision of the Federal Act on the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions for 2021 to 2030. The parliamentary debate on the revision of the act will start in 2018. This will define the development and course of Swiss climate policy for upcoming years. Switzerland aims to tighten the act and reinforce its contribution to the limitation of global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Contrary to the EU emissions trading system (ETS), thus far the Swiss ETS does not incorporate aviation emissions. In order to align and link the Swiss and EU ETS, the Swiss system must include these emissions. As such, the Federal Council recently adopted the Ordinance on the Acquisition and Reporting of Tonne-Kilometre Data relating to Distances Covered by Aircraft.
Various amendments to Swiss environmental statutes and ordinances came into effect in 2016 or will come into effect in 2017. These new measures include certain amendments to the adjustments to the Ordinance on Movements of Waste, a revision of the Ordinance on the Protection against Non-ionising Radiation and amendments to the Federal Act on Forests and the Ordinance on Forests.
Swiss environmental laws provide for certain requirements to allow new building zones and new buildings in areas that are affected by noise. To assess compliance with these requirements, noise measurements are required. In a recent decision, the Federal Supreme Court decided that a widely used method of measurement – so-called 'ventilation-window practice' – is not compatible with legal requirements.
The Federal Supreme Court recently decided on the environmental liability of owners that make their property available to landfill operators in return for financial compensation. The court also held that the cost-bearing duty of the initial property owner did not transfer to the heirs and so they must therefore be released from any cost-bearing duty.
Various amendments to Swiss environmental statutes and ordinances came into effect in 2015 or will come into effect in 2016. These new measures include certain amendments to the Ordinance on Air Pollution Control to reflect technical improvements and amendments to the Ordinance on the Reduction of Risks Relating to the Use of Certain Particularly Dangerous Substances, Preparations and Articles to align Swiss laws with international regulations.
The Federal Supreme Court recently decided three cases concerning the undertaking of construction activities in aquatic areas, which is limited by federal water protection laws and allowed only in exceptional cases. While only fixed installations that serve the public interest may be built in such areas, the authorities may authorise exceptions in certain circumstances.
The Federal Supreme Court recently decided on whether a canton is entitled to federal subsidies for remediation measures in connection with a project on a site that, without the building project, would not be in need of remediation. The court held that there is no legal ground obliging the confederation to subsidise remediation on sites that do not generally need it and that require remediation due only to a particular construction project.
The Federal Council recently enacted amendments to the Environmental Protection Act, the Waters Protection Act and the Gene Technology Act. The amendments relate to the ratification of the Aarhus Convention. Amendments to the Carbon Dioxide Ordinance and the Energy Ordinance have also entered into force, with amendments expected to the Ordinance on the Remediation of Polluted Sites and the Major Accident Ordinance.
Swiss agriculture is free of genetic engineering, with a moratorium banning genetically modified plants and seeds and banning animals from being imported and placed on the Swiss market. The main rules on genetic engineering concern agricultural products, foodstuffs, industrial activities and research and international commerce.
Pursuant to a recent amendment to the federal Environmental Protection Act, polluters may be required to provide appropriate security for the costs of cleaning up a contaminated site. The new approval requirement for the sale or parcelling of a contaminated site can considerably delay a transaction. It is therefore advisable to check the Register of Contaminated Sites and to involve the competent authority in good time.
Various amendments to Swiss environmental statutes and ordinances came into effect in 2013 or will come into effect in 2014. These new measures include stipulations that the sale or parcelling of land listed in the register of contaminated sites will be subject to approval by the responsible authority, as well as amendments which aim to reframe energy politics and facilitate the installation of small power-generating systems.
The Minamata Convention on Mercury is a global treaty to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of mercury. The convention will lead to amendments of the exceptions from the general prohibition to place on the market mercury-containing preparations or articles in Switzerland. The Swiss government has announced its intention to support the convention financially.
Federal case law on light emissions focuses on the legal provisions governing such emissions and the assessment of their harmful effects. Since no explicit provisions govern the maximum permitted amount of light emissions, the Environmental Protection Act provisions on the maximum emission values for air pollution and the act's general provisions on emissions apply.
The Federal Supreme Court recently confirmed the scope of the 'polluter pays' principle. The possessor of a contaminated site at the time of its clean-up is always a polluter for environmental law purposes and the persons that caused the pollution must bear the costs of the clean-up. The court specified that a cost share of between 10% and 30% might be inappropriate if the persons concerned are not responsible for the pollution.
Including: Brownfield sites; Chemicals; VOC emissions; Carbon emissions; Vehicles; Pipelines; Air pollution; Noise protection; Electronic waste.
The Supreme Court has ruled that litter falls into the category of domestic waste and the 'polluter pays' principle applies to litter disposal costs. Each waste holder is not required to cover the exact disposal costs for its own waste; rather, it is sufficient that all waste producers cover the full disposal costs. This decision follows a complaint by retailers charged a fee to cover the costs of removing litter from public areas.
The 'polluter pays' principle states that anyone who causes measures to be taken under the Environmental Protection Law must bear the related costs. However, with regard to sites that were polluted a long time ago, the issue arises of how long the polluter is exposed to potential liability for clean-up costs.
Two key principles apply when the courts are asked to consider noise from traffic sources such as roads, railways and aircraft. The precautionary principle provides that noise emissions should primarily be reduced at source, while the principle of proportionality states that remediation is required only if it is technically and operationally feasible and economically acceptable.
A broad range of federal, cantonal and voluntary private measures are promoting enhanced real estate sustainability in Switzerland. The involvement of private enterprises, foundations and associations leads to a well-balanced and flexible system. The carbon dioxide tax, in particular, makes fossil fuels more expensive and provides a direct incentive to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
The revised Energy Act has come into force. The revision focuses on energy-related measures for buildings, since buildings have high energy-saving potential; they use about 45% of the nation's energy (heat and electricity) and generate about 50% of the nation's carbon dioxide emissions. Thus, the measures aim to save energy while ensuring that buildings are as environmentally friendly as possible.
There is no general obligation under Swiss law to clean up real properties which contain asbestos. However, if the renovation or demolition of such a property is planned, then certain safety precautions must be taken. The legal basis for these precautions is found in the the International Labour Organisation Asbestos Convention, the Federal Act on Accident Insurance and the Federal Ordinance on Accident Prevention.
Article 32c of the Federal Act on the Protection of the Environment requires the cantons to ensure that contaminated sites are cleaned up. This obligation refers only to landfills and other sites that are contaminated with 'waste', as defined by the act. The Federal Supreme Court recently ruled on a cantonal authority's power to allocate decontamination costs when a buyer of a real property finds asbestos during renovation works.
As a party to the Basel Convention on the Control of Cross-Border Movements of Hazardous Waste and its Disposal, Switzerland must ensure that the management of hazardous waste is consistent with the protection of human health and the environment. The legislature has now created a legal framework for industrial waste management and waste disposal.
Despite the recent liberalization of the market for sustainable biofuels, bioethanol has not yet successfully penetrated the market. The Federal Council has decided to remove certain legal obstacles with respect to bioethanol by amending the applicable statutes and procedures. This update outlines the statutes and administrative procedures that apply to all biofuel producers, importers and sellers on the Swiss market.
Climate change is increasingly considered a serious and controversial issue for global society. Thus, in 1997, industrialized countries signed the Kyoto Protocol in order to cope with the severe problems associated with climate change by enacting national legal provisions based on international and democratic rules and the principles of the free market economy. This update considers the steps taken in Switzerland.
The Federal Court recently ruled on parking fees in connection with the construction of an exhibition and trade centre in the Canton of Zurich. The decision highlights the fact that different kinds of facility require different handling with regard to parking fees and the effective reduction of emissions.
The Swiss Federal Court recently issued two decisions regarding jurisdiction under the Federal Water Protection Statute. In the first, the court ruled on whether rainwater draining off the large copper-covered roof of the Lucerne Culture and Convention Centre was considered to be polluted; in the second, the court considered the assessment of fees for connecting to the canal system.
In a recent case regarding contamination at Zurich airport, the Federal Supreme Court ruled that the Zurich Office for Waste, Water, Energy and Air Quality, and not the Federal Office of Civil Aviation, was to be considered the competent authority to allocate clean-up costs under the Environmental Protection Law.
Hundreds of noise nuisance actions are pending at first instance against the operator of Kloten airport, which has been privatized since 2001. Recent Supreme Court decisions provide guidance in dealing with the relevant jurisdiction of the courts, and with the evaluation and the amount of compensatory damages for excessive aircraft noise.
The Federal Act on the Protection of the Environment came into force on January 1 1985. Article 9 provides a legal basis for environmental impact assessments. Since 1985 various minor revisions to the act have been made. The most recent became effective on July 1 2007. Since then, minor issues have arisen, particularly concerning the right of particular organizations to appeal against certain projects.
In many parts of Switzerland smog is a common occurrence. Smog is the overload of the atmosphere with particulate matter during the winter months and with ozone during the summer months, respectively. The Swiss Conference of the Head Officials of Construction, Planning and Environmental Matters has resolved on short-term measures on air pollution control.
The Federal Supreme Court regularly decides cases about the installation of antennae for mobile communications, noises emanating from public facilities such as restaurants and odour nuisances caused by factory plants. Recent decisions have addressed common questions on these recurring issues.
The Federal Supreme Court recently decided a case regarding the permitted hours of use of an open-air sports facility which has recently been expanded. The lower instance court had allowed restrictive hours on the basis of a German regulation, but the Supreme Court revoked the decision and requested the cantonal court to render a new judgment in line with its considerations.
According to the 'polluter pays' principle, the originator of pollution bears the costs for the avoidance and clean-up of pollution. A recent judgment of the Federal Court clarifies that the principle is also valid with regard to noise pollution. Furthermore, the principle applies to the state that is the originator of a motorway.
Swiss constitutional law provides a basis for the implementation of sustainable development. In addition, sustainability assessments, such as those established for road projects by the Federal Road office, allow the relevant authorities to assess whether particular projects take sustainable development issues into account.
Under new provisions on the clean-up of contaminated sites, if a building is located on a polluted site and the clean-up of that site becomes necessary only upon demolition of the building, then two-thirds of the additional costs of examination and disposal of the contaminated material will be allocated to the original contaminator and to the former owners of the site, respectively.
Recently, substantial amendments have been made to important areas of Swiss law concerning the protection of the environment and of people's health and safety. The amended laws regulate climate protection, the management of waste (in particular hazardous waste) and the handling of chemical products.
To find a remedy to the problem of air pollution, Swiss public authorities have developed a number of approaches to improve air quality by controlling the volume of individual traffic. These approaches focus on shopping malls, large sports facilities and similar places which frequently attract high numbers of visitors, causing heavy individual traffic as in many cases public transport is insufficient.
In February 2021 the Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee of the National Council surprisingly decided to include the initiative to temporarily prohibit the acquisition of business premises by persons abroad in the revised urgent COVID-19 Act instead of amending the Lex Koller through the ordinary legislative process. However, the Council of States and the National Council recently rejected the proposal. Despite this pleasing result, the topic remains on the agenda.
The Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council recently submitted an initiative that would temporarily prohibit the acquisition of business premises by persons abroad. The proposal claims that it will mitigate the negative impact of the COVID-19 crisis by preventing foreign investors from acquiring financially distressed Swiss companies at low prices. However, as foreign investors improve the sales conditions for such companies by fostering demand, the amendment would actually be counterproductive.
The proposed COVID-19 Business Rental Act has failed in Parliament and is thus off the table on a national level. The main arguments for the dismissal included the retroactive intervention in private law contracts and the legal uncertainty with regard to the question of whether the proposed act had a sufficient constitutional basis. However, the topic of COVID-19 rent reductions will likely lead to court decisions in the future.
The Federal Council recently submitted to Parliament a preliminary draft federal act on rent payments during the COVID-19 lockdown and opened the consultation procedure with the cantons, political parties and interested organisations. The act is a political decision and its constitutional basis is questionable. Further, a number of the suggested provisions leave room for improvement.
Numerous shops, restaurants and other facilities throughout Switzerland have had to close their businesses due to emergency regulations issued to combat COVID-19. This has led to the question of whether the tenants of such premises are still obliged to pay rent or whether they are entitled to a full or partial rent reduction. Despite many opinions having been expressed in the legal community and by politicians, this question remains as unanswered as it was at the beginning of the lockdown.
In response to growing market needs, several cantons have introduced an electronic procedure for building permit requests. The improved applications and increased transparency with regard to the documentation and the status of building permit procedures enable planners to carry out projects more efficiently. This is a major advantage, especially for institutional investors and project developers.
As of 1 July 2020, new provisions will apply to electronic access to land register data. Whereas current access to electronic land register data is highly restricted, the new legal provisions of the Federal Ordinance on the Land Register extend access to electronic land register data for specified parties. While the ordinance provides the basis for this extended access to land registers, it is up to the cantons to decide whether they wish to introduce it.
According to federal planning principles, the cantons and municipalities must guarantee free public access to lakesides and riverbanks. However, some cantons have not yet implemented the required legislation, not least because of objections from private landowners. This article outlines the applicable federal legal framework and highlights examples of its implementation by two cantons.
While it remains unclear when and on what terms Brexit will happen, the United Kingdom and Switzerland recently signed an agreement on citizens' rights which covers the purchase and retention of real estate by UK citizens in Switzerland and vice versa. After Brexit, UK citizens with a legal and actual Swiss residence will require a permanent Swiss residence permit (C permit). Otherwise, they will be considered persons abroad and will be subject to the Lex Koller restrictions.
Swiss voters recently rejected an initiative that aimed to stop urban sprawl by freezing the overall size of building zones and strictly limiting exceptions that allow building activities outside building zones. While supporters of the initiative considered the current legal regime to be insufficient, opponents argued that the proposed initiative was overly strict, unable to accommodate cantonal and regional differences and inadequate to address population and economic growth.
The Federal Supreme Court recently addressed for the first time whether the prohibition to build secondary homes on private property entitles landowners to compensation. The court ruled on the consequences of the withdrawal of a previously established right through an amendment of the law and clarified that the concept of private property is not a fixed notion inaccessible to change. There is no entitlement to a permanent definition of the concept of private property.
In March 2017 the federal government submitted to public consultation several proposals to amend the legal regime governing foreign investments in Swiss real property. The vast majority of the comments received rejected the proposed amendments. While the government subsequently dropped its plan to amend the Lex Koller and a related ordinance, certain pending parliamentary motions may impact the Lex Koller regime in the medium term.
Swiss legislation provides for adequate compensation for considerable advantages and disadvantages resulting from spatial planning measures. In particular, land that is newly allocated to a building zone substantially increases in value. Owners of such land will benefit from spatial planning activities without any contribution on their part. For reasons of fairness, these benefits are subject to a levy which is supposed to 'skim off' part of the added value.
The proposed second part of the Spatial Planning Act revision will give the cantons more flexibility with regard to construction activities outside building zones so that they can consider their individual needs more appropriately. An initiative to stop uncontrolled urban sprawl will oblige the federation, cantons and communities to freeze the present size of building zones and ensure that the zones grow no further.
Foreign investments in Swiss real estate are governed by a federal law known as the 'Lex Koller' and additional cantonal rules. The law restricts the acquisition of residential real property by non-Swiss residents. In a recent decision, the Federal Supreme Court decided for the first time that the sale of a vacation home between two non-Swiss residents is allowed only in designated communities. The decision stops a long-standing practice of the cantonal authorities.
An initiative adopted in 2012 led to a constitutional amendment limiting the total number of second homes in any municipality to 20% of the total number of residential units existing in the concerned municipality. Each municipality is obliged to keep an inventory of all homes and to update it by the end of each calendar year. The Federal Office for Spatial Development recently published the inventories of second homes for the first time.
Even though the federal Parliament recently rejected two motions to tighten the legal regime governing foreign investments in Swiss real estate, the federal government has now submitted a number of proposals that head in the same direction. Under the guise of closing loopholes and improving law enforcement, a substantial tightening of the legal regime governing foreign investments is under discussion.
Swiss environmental laws provide for certain requirements to allow new building zones and new buildings in areas that are affected by noise. To assess compliance with these requirements, noise measurements are required. In a recent decision, the Federal Supreme Court decided that a widely used method of measurement – so-called 'ventilation-window practice' – is not compatible with legal requirements.
The cadastre of public law restrictions on land ownership (PLR cadastre) is being developed by the federal government and the cantons. It is one of the three cornerstones of the Swiss cadastral system, besides the land register and cadastral surveying. Whereas information on private law restrictions can be obtained from the land register, the PLR cadastre provides information about the most important public law restrictions on land ownership.
Following the United Kingdom's EU referendum, the legal situation of UK citizens – particularly those living in Switzerland – is likely to change in relation to Swiss real estate. Until Brexit takes legal effect, UK citizens with legal and actual Swiss residence may be treated as Swiss residents and thus may acquire Swiss residential properties without restriction. However, this should change once Brexit takes legal effect.
The Civil Code and the Federal Ordinance on the Land Register govern formal and substantive land register matters, including land register management, access to register information and the legal effect of register entries. Even though land register matters are mainly governed by federal laws, the registers are kept by cantonal authorities. Thus, land register information should be requested from the cantonal authority at the place of the concerned property.
A non-Swiss resident inherited one Swiss holiday home and already owned another. The question arose of whether he had to sell one of the properties due to restrictions on the acquisition of Swiss real estate by non-Swiss residents. The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the rule that non-Swiss residents may acquire only one holiday home does not apply to legal heirs.
In March 2015 Parliament adopted the Federal Act on Second Homes, which is expected to enter into force in early 2016 and will govern the final implementation of the new rule restricting second homes. The relevant constitutional provision states that no more than 20% of the total number of residential units and of the gross residential floor area in any municipality may be used as second homes.
The Federal Supreme Court recently considered whether a co-tenant had standing to challenge wrongful termination of a lease contract on her own. It stated that a lease contract cannot be terminated for one co-tenant only; therefore, all parties concerned must participate in an action challenging the lease termination. However, this does not mean that all co-tenants must be on the same side of the bar.
The Federal Supreme Court recently had to decide for the first time whether challenging the termination of a lease during conciliation or court proceedings requires the landlord's knowledge of the pending proceedings. It concluded that protection against untimely termination applies from the start of the proceedings until a final decision is rendered, irrespective of when the landlord becomes aware of proceedings.
The Code of Obligations provides that where a tenant is in arrears with rent or charges, the landlord may set a time limit for payment and notify the tenant that in the event of non-payment, it will terminate the lease. The Federal Supreme Court recently confirmed that this provision must be applied strictly, as its purpose is to ensure that landlords are paid on time and leases are terminated in case of late payment.
In the event of a housing shortage, the cantons may make it obligatory for a landlord to use an official cantonal form when contracting a new lease which indicates the rent paid by the previous tenant. The Federal Supreme Court recently confirmed that failure to use the form does not lead to the nullity of a lease contract as a whole, but only to the nullity of the rent fixed in the lease.
Certain restrictions and approval requirements apply to agricultural businesses and agricultural land, and the sale of such businesses or land requires approval. The Federal Supreme Court recently held that a leaseholder's pre-emptive right is subject to the main asset test and requires that a majority of shares be transferred.
Foreign investment in Swiss real estate is governed by a federal law known as the 'Lex Koller'. The government recently announced a revision of the Lex Koller in order to address certain enforcement problems and loopholes. A popular initiative may follow to tighten the regime, but it would take several years before such changes to the law were legally effective.
The Federal Supreme Court recently confirmed that the contract for the transfer of a lease is a contract between the former tenant and the new tenant, and that the landlord's written consent is a condition precedent for the validity of such a contract. In case of a transfer of a main lease, and without any reservation under the transfer contract, a sublease for the same lease object ends with the main lease.