Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
WeirFoulds

Proposed class action claims refunds for flights cancelled due to COVID-19

Newsletters

29 April 2020

Aviation Canada

Basis of claim
Representative plaintiff
Proposed class
Class period
Relief sought
Comment



Air Canada, WestJet, Air Transat, Sunwing, and Swoop are facing a proposed class action for offering vouchers and credits in lieu of refunds for flights that were cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Basis of claim

On 27 March 2020 a proposed class action was filed in the Federal Court of Canada alleging that these airlines must provide cash refunds for itineraries that were cancelled due to COVID-19 pursuant to their contracts with passengers and their international and domestic tariffs incorporated into those contracts.

The claim further alleges that it is a term of the airlines' contracts of carriage or tariffs that passengers have a right to a refund of the fare paid (if they do not wish to accept a voucher or credit) if the carrier is unable to transport them for a reason outside of the passenger's control.

The claim describes each of the policies put in place by the airlines in response to COVID-19 with respect to cancelled flights and the provision of vouchers or credits, subject to certain restrictions (eg, they must be redeemed within 24 months).

The claim further states that, because each of the named airlines has announced lay-offs, they will not be incurring certain operating costs, including labour, fuel and landing fees. Therefore, it would be unconscionable for the airlines to retain the funds paid by the class members while not incurring the operating costs that those funds were meant to cover.

The claim further alleges that the airlines' conduct in implementing these new policies is unconscionable, as the class members run the risk of the airlines becoming insolvent and the credits provided becoming worthless.

Moreover, the claim states that the airlines' policies are forcing class members "to spend their monies with the same [air carrier] in the future to purchase travel that the Class Members may not wish to undertake any longer, and likely at a substantially different price".

Representative plaintiff

The representative plaintiff, Janet Donaldson (a resident of British Columbia), is alleged to have purchased a return ticket from WestJet from Vancouver to New York with a stopover in Toronto.

Proposed class

The proposed plaintiff class is described in the statement of claim as follows:

All persons, residing anywhere in the world, who before March 11, 2020 entered into a Contract of Carriage (defined below) with any of the Defendants for travel on a flight operated by a Defendant on a trip that was scheduled to commence between March 13, 2020 until the date the Government of Canada withdraws travel advisories for COVID-19, and have not received a refund in the original form of payment:

A further subclass of Class Members whose flights from March 13, 2020 until the dates listed below were cancelled and/or suspended by the Defendant in response to the COVID-19 situation (hereafter the Cancellation Sub-Class).

  • May 31, 2020 (for Westjet and Swoop);
  • April 30, 2020 (for Sunwing, Air Transat, and Air Canada); or
  • Any other date to be determined by the Court.

The statement of claim notes that "it is estimated that the Class includes tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of affected passengers".

The class counsel's website states that "if your flight tickets were… included as part of a vacation package, it may not be included as part of this proposed class action". The website states that the law firm is reviewing and will provide further information on this aspect of the claim at a later date.

Class period

The statement of claim states that the class period will be between 13 March 2020 and the date that the government withdraws travel advisories relating to COVID-19.

The claim describes the reason for selecting 11 March 2020 and 13 March 2020, respectively, as key dates for defining the class period. On 11 March 2020 the World Health Organisation declared COVID-19 a global pandemic and on 13 March 2020 the government issued a blanket travel advisory against non-essential travel outside Canada and restricting the entry of foreign nationals.

Relief sought

The proposed class action seeks, among other things, an order requiring the airlines to provide monetary refunds to class members and pay damages (including punitive damages).

The statement of claim also seeks various declarations from the court, including that:

  • the contracts of carriage between each class member and the relevant airline was terminated based on the doctrine of frustration as of 13 March 2020;
  • contracts of carriage between each of the class members and the airlines include an expressed or implied term that entitles the class members to a full refund if carriage is no longer possible for reasons outside the control of the class member, and that each of the airlines breached this term; and
  • the airlines breached the duty to perform the contracts of carriage in good faith.

The statement of claim also outlines a number of other orders sought, including an order that:

  • funds that were received by the airlines from the class members be paid into court pending a final disposition (ie, a settlement or judgment);
  • the airlines' communications with class members, including messages posted on websites, "prominently refer to the fact that there is a pending class action seeking various relief"; and
  • the airlines process refunds in the original form of payment made by the class members.

Comment

Air carriers have spent the past few weeks reacting to an unprecedented situation, including attempting to respond to government directives from all over the world and assist in repatriating those citizens stranded far from home.

It remains to be seen whether a class action in Canada's Federal Court with such a wide scope – as opposed to a government bailout or coordinated response from regulators – will be considered the most efficient way to deal with the claims of those whose flights have been cancelled due to COVID-19.

Notably, the Canadian Transportation Agency (the body responsible for regulating air carriers in Canada), released a statement on 25 March 2020 regarding the use of vouchers in light of COVID-19, which states in part that:

[A]n appropriate approach in the current context could be for airlines to provide affected passengers with vouchers or credits for future travel, as long as these vouchers or credits do not expire in an unreasonably short period of time (24 months would be considered reasonable in most cases).

For further information on this topic please contact Carlos P Martins or Emma Romano at Bersenas Jacobsen Chouest Thomson Blackburn LLP by telephone (+1 416 982 3800) or email (cmartins@lexcanada.com or eromano@lexcanada.com). The Bersenas Jacobsen Chouest Thomson Blackburn website can be accessed at www.lexcanada.com.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Carlos P Martins

Carlos P Martins

Emma Romano

Emma Romano

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

Today's articles

  • Passenger versus service cart – typical aviation hazard? - Germany
  • CDC mask mandate versus rights of passengers with disabilities - USA

More articles

More from this firm

  • Air carrier avoids liability for refusal to transport disruptive passenger
  • Filing insurance certificates with Canadian Transportation Agency
  • Should expert reports on Montreal Convention be allowed in challenge to APPRs?
  • Air passenger rights group challenges CTA statements on COVID-19 vouchers
  • Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada unable to consider costs after withdrawal

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *