Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Morrison & Foerster LLP

SEC charges Switzerland-based dealer for selling US investors unregistered SBS for bitcoins

Newsletters

14 January 2020

Banking & Financial Services USA


In October, the SEC charged a Switzerland-based securities dealer for offering and selling unregistered security-based swaps to U.S. investors using bitcoins and for failing to transact its swaps on a registered national exchange, according to an SEC order instituting cease and desist proceedings (the "Order"). A copy of the Order can be found here.

Without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, the dealer consented to the Order and agreed to cease-and-desist operations. In addition, the dealer agreed to pay disgorgement of $31,687 in commissions, overnight holding fees, and its share of trading profits from its U.S. investors, as well as a civil penalty of $100,000. The dealer also undertook remedial efforts to pay back U.S. investors their trading losses.

According to the Order, from late 2014 through 2019, the dealer targeted U.S.-based retail investors and offered and sold them, through its website, various investments in exchange for payments in bitcoin. Although described with different terminology (such as bitcoin Asset Linked Notes, i.e., "bALNs"), the investments were essentially security-based swaps that track the real-time price of a variety of U.S.-listed securities.

The U.S. resident investors who purchased the security-based swaps at issue did not qualify as "eligible contract participants" with $5 million or $10 million invested on a discretionary basis. As a result, according to the Order, the dealer's conduct violated the securities laws when the swaps were not subject to an effective registration statement and were not traded on a national securities exchange.

In a parallel action, the CFTC entered into a similar settlement with the dealer arising from similar conduct.

This case illustrates that the use of new technology such as bitcoins and new terminology (such as bALNs) does not exempt investment-product dealers from having to comply with the U.S. federal securities laws.

For further information on this topic please contact Lloyd Harmetz, Yiyang Huang or James Schwartz at Morrision and Foerster's New York office by telephone (+1 212 468 8000) or email (lharmetz@mofo.com, yiyanghuang@mofo.com or jschwartz@mofo.com). Alternatively, please contact Jeremy Jennings-Mares at Morrison & Foerster LLP's London office by telephone (+44 20 7920 4000) or email (jjenningsmares@mofo.com). The Morrison & Foerster LLP website can be accessed at www.mofo.com.

This article has been reproduced in its original format from Lexology – www.Lexology.com.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Lloyd Harmetz

Lloyd Harmetz

Yiyang Huang

Yiyang Huang

James Schwartz

James Schwartz

Jeremy Jennings-Mares

Jeremy Jennings-Mares

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

More from this firm

  • 2019 SEC regulatory summary: advisers and funds
  • FINRA: suitability and sales practices remain an issue
  • Supreme Court will decide courts' authority to order disgorgement in SEC enforcement cases
  • FINRA fines broker-dealer for unsuitable sale of complex securities
  • NASAA issues report on broker-dealer policies and procedures for leveraged or inverse ETFs

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *