We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
11 June 2019
Proposed amendments to exclude low-revenue smaller reporting companies
Proposed amendments to transition provisions in accelerated and large accelerated filer definitions
On May 9, 2019, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") proposed amendments to the "accelerated filer" and "large accelerated filer" definitions adopted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). The SEC believes that it can promote capital formation for smaller reporting issuers by more appropriately tailoring the types of issuers that are included in the categories of accelerated and large accelerated filers and revising the transition thresholds for accelerated and large accelerated filers. The proposed amendments would:
In the Proposing Release, the SEC indicates that certain low-revenue issuers would not be required to obtain an auditor attestation of internal control over financial reporting; however, such issuers would continue to be required to establish and maintain internal control over financial reporting and assess the effectiveness of such controls.
On June 28, 2018, the Commission adopted amendments to the definition of a "smaller reporting company" to expand the number of issuers that can utilize the scaled disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Following these amendments, however, some issuers are now categorized as both smaller reporting companies and accelerated or large accelerated filers, and issuers falling into this category must comply with the requirement to obtain an auditor attestation of their internal control over financial reporting.
When the SEC adopted these amendments, Chairman Jay Clayton directed the SEC staff to formulate recommendations for rule amendments that, if adopted, would appropriately redefine the issuers that are designated as accelerated filers. The Chairman directed the staff to consider, among other things, the historical and current relationship between the smaller reporting company and accelerated filer definitions, as well as how the rule change could reduce compliance costs for certain registrants, while maintaining investor protections. The proposed rule changes are consistent with these objectives.
The SEC has proposed amendments to revise the accelerated and large accelerated filer definitions to exclude from those definitions issuers that are eligible to be a smaller reporting company under the smaller reporting company revenue test.
Under the existing accelerated filer definition, an issuer must satisfy three conditions to be an accelerated filer:
Under the existing large accelerated filer definition, an issuer must meet the second and third conditions described above and have a public float of $700 million or more as of last business day of the issuer's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
The proposed amendments would add a new condition to the definitions of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer that would exclude from those definitions an issuer eligible to be a smaller reporting company under the revenue test in the smaller reporting company definition. These proposed new conditions would only be available to issuers that are eligible to be a smaller reporting company under the revenue test set forth in Rule 12b-2. As a result, issuers that are eligible to be a smaller reporting company that have a public float between $75 million and $250 million would be accelerated filers if their annual revenues are $100 million or more, and thus they would remain subject to all of the requirements applicable to accelerated filers. Under the proposed amendments, a foreign private issuer that qualifies as a smaller reporting company under the revenue test of the smaller reporting company definition and is eligible to use the scaled disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies would qualify for the exclusion under the accelerated filer definition.
The SEC states in the Proposing Release that the proposed amendments would increase the number of issuers that are exempt from the requirement to provide an auditor attestation of internal control over financial reporting by increasing the number of non-accelerated filers.
Under the existing transition rules, an issuer that is an accelerated or a large accelerated filer will not become a non-accelerated or accelerated filer until its public float falls below a lower threshold than the public float threshold that was required to qualify an accelerated or large accelerated filer. This lower threshold for exiting accelerated filer and large accelerated filer status is intended to avoid situations in which an issuer would enter and exit accelerated and large accelerated filer status due to relatively small fluctuations in its public float.
The SEC proposed to amend the transition thresholds for issuers exiting accelerated filer and large accelerated filer status as follows:
The SEC proposed to increase the public float transition thresholds so that the transition thresholds are 80% of the initial thresholds, which would be consistent with the percentage used in the transition thresholds for smaller reporting company eligibility. The SEC also believes that raising these thresholds would limit the cases in which an issuer could be both an accelerated filer and a smaller reporting company or a large accelerated filer and a smaller reporting company.
The proposed amendments would also add the smaller reporting company revenue test to the public float transition thresholds for accelerated and large accelerated filers. Under the proposed amendments, an issuer that is already an accelerated filer will remain one unless either its public float falls below $60 million or it becomes eligible to use the smaller reporting company accommodations under the revenue test in paragraphs (2) or (3)(iii)(B), as applicable, of the smaller reporting company definition. An issuer that is initially applying the smaller reporting company definition or that previously qualified as a smaller reporting company would apply paragraph (2) of the smaller reporting company definition. Once an issuer determines that it does not qualify for smaller reporting company status, it would apply paragraph (3)(iii)(B) of the smaller reporting company definition when making its next annual determination.
The SEC has requested public comment on many aspects of the proposed amendments. Public comments are due 60 days following publication of the Proposing Release in the Federal Register.
To view all formatting for this article (eg, tables, footnotes), please access the original here.
For further information on this topic please contact David M Lynn at Morrison & Foerster LLP by telephone (+1 202 887 1500) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org). The Morrison & Foerster LLP website can be accessed at www.mofo.com.
This article has been reproduced in its original format from Lexology – www.Lexology.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.