We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
June 02 2011
On March 1 2011 four notifications were issued by the government of India under the Competition Act 2002. On the same day, the draft merger regulations were issued by the Competition Commission (for further details please see "Government issues new merger control provisions"). These collectively initiated the process of enforcement of merger control in India.
Momentous efforts were subsequently undertaken by both the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Competition Commission to address the concerns of national and international experts regarding the draft merger regulations. Competition law practitioners were also involved in this consultative process, including the Law Firms Working Group, comprising those of India's leading law firms that have a dedicated competition law practice, constituted impromptu at the commission on April 8 2011 to suggest "clause by clause" amendments in the draft merger regulations. The group submitted its final drafts on April 13 2011.
As a part of this consultative process, re-initiated by the commission thereafter, public meetings and seminars were organised with industry chambers in all regions of India. A good precedent in the development of competition legislation has been established in India, which needs to be commended.
Accordingly, on May 11 2011 the commission published its final merger regulations, entitled "Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combination) Regulations, 2011". The regulations, available on the commission's website,(1) entered into force on June 1 2011.
Under Section 5 of the act, 'combination' is defined as "acquisition of one or more enterprises by one or more persons or merger or amalgamation of enterprises".
Some of the key features of the new merger regulations are as follows.
Shorter review period
Under Section 29(1) of the act, the commission must file its prima facie opinion as to whether the combination is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market in India, within 30 days of receipt of the notice of the proposed combination (in Form I or Form II). The total period for review remains at 210 days.
The commission may call for additional information or accept modification, if offered by the parties before formation of the commission's opinion, within the 30-day period. Under Regulation 19, the time taken by the parties for furnishing additional information or for offering modification shall be excluded from the period of 180 days stated below; similarly, the additional time needed by the commission for evaluation of the offered modification, not exceeding 15 days, will be excluded from the period of 180 days.
Additionally, under Regulation 28(6), the commission will endeavour to pass the final order within 180 days of filing of the notice under Section 6(2) of the act:
Exemption for certain transactions from filing of notice requirement
Schedule I of the new merger regulations specifies a list of transactions that are ordinarily unlikely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. It further declares, in Regulation 4, that notice under Section 6(2) of the act need not normally be filed for such transactions. Schedule I includes:
The merger regulations provide for three forms for the notice to be filed for obtaining approval wherever required. Under Regulation 5(3), the parties may file the details of the proposed combination, depending upon the category to which the proposed transaction belongs, in:
Form III (as stated in Regulation 6) is for use by public financial institutions, foreign institutional investors, banks or venture capital funds, in respect of share subscription, financial facility or any acquisition made by them pursuant to any covenant of a loan agreement or investment agreement, under Section 6(5) of the act.
Under Regulation 11, the fee payable alongside the notice in Form I or Form II, has been reduced substantially; the new fees are Rs50,000 for Form I and Rs10 million for Form II. There are no fees for Form III.
Under Regulation 7, where a notice filed in Form I or Form II is received after the 30-day time limit prescribed under Section 6(2) of the act, the commission may admit such notice without prejudice to its power to impose penalty for non-furnishing of such notice under Section 43A of the act.
Transactions taking effect before June 1 2011 need not be notified
The commission has now removed the ambiguity previously present by declaring that only such combinations that 'take effect' on or after June 1 2011 need to be notified to the commission. Accordingly, under Regulation 31, the notice under Section 6(2) of the act would be applicable as follows:
Obligation to file the notice
The merger regulations impose the obligation to notify on the acquirer, including in cases of hostile acquisitions where the acquirer is not in a position to notify, the party being acquired may be asked to notify. In cases of mergers or amalgamations, parties must file the notice jointly, in either Form I or Form II, as the case may be.
Under Regulation 9, in cases where the ultimate intended effect of a business transaction is achieved by way of a series of steps or smaller individual transactions that are interconnected or interdependent on each other, which may amount to a combination, a single notice covering all these transactions may be filed by the parties to the combinations.
Request for confidentiality
The merger regulations prescribe that any request for confidentiality of the documents submitted during the investigation will be considered with due regard to the procedure laid down in the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009. Under Regulation 30, the request may, among other things, state the reasons, justification and implications for the business of the parties so that the same may be considered by the commission while taking decision in the matter.
Appointment of independent agencies to oversee modification
The merger regulations provide for the appointment of independent agencies to oversee the carrying of modifications suggested by the commission in cases where the parties have accepted such modifications and, according to the commission, the parties' implementation. The agencies to be appointed must have no conflicts of interest, and may include accountancy firms, management consultancy firms, law firms or other professional organisations or independent practitioners of repute. Under Regulation 27, payment to the appointed agencies must be made by the parties.
For further information on this topic please contact MM Sharma or Vinay Vaish at Vaish Associates by telephone (+91 11 4249 2525), fax (+91 11 2332 0484) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com).
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.