Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Schoenherr

Competition Protection Agency investigates potential collusion among four LPG providers

Newsletters

26 November 2020

Competition & Antitrust Slovenia

Introduction
Facts
Comment


Introduction

The Competition Protection Agency has initiated an investigation into a potential restrictive agreement or concerted practices among four energy companies – Butan plin, dd, INA Slovenija, doo, Istrabenz plini doo and Plinarna Maribor doo. The agency has reasons to believe that the companies breached Article 6 of the Prevention of the Restriction of Competition Act and Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by agreeing to accept returns of only their own liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cylinders.

Facts

The Competition Protection Agency suspects that the companies mutually agreed not to accept any LPG cylinders over which other companies have proprietary rights, with the aim of sharing the market and allocating consumers among themselves. The agency has stated that three of the companies – Butan plin, dd, Istrabenz plini doo and Plinarna Maribor doo – also adopted general conditions which prohibit end sellers and consumers from transferring possession of the LPG cylinders. Moreover, the agency has found it problematic that the cylinders are handed over to consumers against payment of a refundable deposit for which they are issued a deposit certificate. On returning the companies' cylinders, the full deposit is refunded only if the consumer presents a valid deposit certificate.

According to the agency, such certificates inevitably get lost and consumers can no longer return the cylinder and get their full deposit refunded. Consequently, the agency believes that consumers will be reluctant to change their LPG provider and will stay with their current one. This was likely the parties' objective, the agency has claimed, which indicates the intention to share the market and allocate consumers. However, market sharing usually leads to higher prices for consumers.

Comment

In general, any agreements or concerted practices which are aimed at or have the effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in Slovenia are prohibited. The main idea behind company-owned instead of customer-owned cylinders is to allow companies to take effective control and responsibility for cylinder safety. In the case of company-owned cylinders, refundable deposit systems (and vouchers given as a receipt for the original deposit) are standard in the LPG market. More details regarding any potential infringements are yet to follow and the agency is currently asking all interested parties to forward it any information that they may have which could be relevant for the investigation. All things considered, the investigation shows that the agency remains vigilant to any anti-competitive conduct despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

For further information on this topic please contact Eva Škufca or Lea Avsenik at Schoenherr by telephone (+386 1 200 09 80) or email (e.skufca@schoenherr.eu or l.avsenik@schoenherr.eu). The Schoenherr website can be accessed at www.schoenherr.eu.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Eva Škufca

Eva Škufca

Lea Avsenik

Lea Avsenik

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

More from this firm

  • Expected developments and competition law considerations in light of fuel market liberalisation
  • Administrative Court revokes TV channel divestment order
  • Court slashes Agrokor's gun-jumping fine to €1 million
  • CPA praises Coca-Cola for good business practices
  • CPA examines multi-apartment building management market

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *