We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
19 November 2020
Further fines imposed for RPM in UK musical instruments sector
First RPM case brought against retailer
CMA's active monitoring of online resale pricing activities
Director disqualification and RPM
What does this mean for businesses and individuals?
On 29 June 2020 the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) made a number of announcements regarding certain investigations into resale price maintenance (RPM) within the UK musical instruments sector.
However, these announcements have wider consequences in the context of the CMA's enforcement activities more generally in relation to RPM, with key aspects including that:
While the CMA has yet to publish infringement decisions in the context of the relevant investigations, this article considers these key aspects and their implications for businesses and individuals.
On 29 June 2020 the CMA announced that it had imposed fines totalling £5.5 million on two musical instrument suppliers.(1)
The two suppliers were fined for engaging in RPM, which was intended to restrict retailers' freedoms to set their own resale prices online by requiring them to sell the suppliers' instruments at or above minimum resale prices.
Notably, both suppliers used price monitoring software to monitor retailers' online prices in 'real time' and enforce their RPM strategies, with individual retailers reluctant to apply discounts in case they were caught and penalised for doing so.
Separately, the CMA announced that it has taken enforcement action against a musical instrument retailer for engaging in RPM with another supplier.
This is the first time that the CMA has taken enforcement action against a retailer in an RPM case and the retailer has agreed to pay a maximum fine of £278,945 in the context of the CMA's settlement procedure.(2)
The supplier in question was granted total immunity from fines under the CMA's leniency programme, on the basis that it was the first to bring the infringing arrangement to the CMA's attention.
In connection with these announcements, the CMA published a blog confirming its use of an online price monitoring tool to identify potential instances of RPM.
This tool was created by the CMA's in-house data, technology and analytics unit and was used during certain investigations into the supply of musical instruments in the United Kingdom.
In total, the CMA's investigations into this sector have resulted in fines of £13.7 million (including the £5.5 million in fines outlined above), with the CMA writing an open letter to the sector, emphasising to retailers in particular that: "If you have agreed to sell at fixed or minimum prices with your supplier, you may both be found to be breaking competition law."(3)
The CMA has now confirmed that its online price monitoring tool will be used in other sectors, so as to enable the CMA to prioritise its enforcement action in respect of RPM.
In terms of enforcement action, the CMA's blog also makes clear that, in addition to fines, RPM can "lead to director disqualifications".
In recent years, the CMA has sought director disqualifications in the context of infringing arrangements between competitors.
However, this latest statement indicates that the CMA would now be minded to (at least) consider pursuing director disqualifications in RPM cases, increasing the personal risks of non-compliance for individuals.
These announcements emphasise the CMA's commitment to taking enforcement action in respect of RPM and highlight the possibility of individuals being held personally responsible for infringements through director disqualifications.
Against this background, retailers and suppliers should ensure that their arrangements in relation to resale pricing are compliant with UK and EU competition law, including where they relate to the use of price monitoring software.
Where any concerns arise, appropriate advice and action should be promptly taken. Depending on the arrangements in question, this could include applying for immunity under the CMA's leniency programme, so as to seek to obtain immunity from fines and protection from director disqualification proceedings for cooperating directors.
For further information on this topic please contact Samuel Beighton or Bernardine Adkins at Gowling WLG by telephone (+44 207 379 0000) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com). The Gowling WLG website can be accessed at www.gowlingwlg.com.
(1) See "Musical instrument firms to pay millions after breaking competition law", CMA press release, 29 June 2020.
(2) See "Musical instruments and equipment: suspected anti-competitive agreements 50565-6", case page.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.