We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
01 March 2021
In several decisions, the Department of Legal Affairs has outlined the limits of the free-will principle for shareholders when setting the procedure and requirements for the preferential rights for purchasing shares in attachment cases.
On 23 November 2020 the Department of Legal Affairs ruled in a decision concerning a bylaw relating to the applicable regime for transfers arising from the seizure of a company's shares, which allows for reflection on the true scope of the free-will principle for shareholders with respect to the compulsory transfer of shares.
In the case at hand, the Department of Legal Affairs considered a bylaw article that had been unanimously passed at a shareholders' meeting which acknowledged the preferential purchase right of a company, and subsequently the rest of the shareholders, when there was a compulsory transfer of shares from one of them. The article stated that:
The Department of Legal Affairs confirmed the position held by the registrar who refused to include this article for two reasons:
In the context of this decision, it is useful to draw attention to the fact that there are other items which deviate from the procedures and conditions established in Article 109 of the Corporate Enterprises Act that are supported by the free-will principle, as understood by the Department of Legal Affairs (in decisions dated 9 May 2019, 23 May 2019, 6 February 2020 and 27 February 2020), as these items neither break the law nor contradict the principal elements of limited liability companies.
The first item relates to the procedure to follow in the case of a compulsory transfer of shares. Article 109 of the Corporate Enterprises Act establishes that the auction or adjudication of seized stakes must be suspended, as well as the right of the shareholders and, if the bylaws establish a right of pre-emption in its name, the company, to be subrogated to the rights of the awardee or creditor, in accordance with the abovementioned conditions. The Legal Affairs Department's decision states that the procedure envisioned by the Corporate Enterprises Act is of a restricted character and, therefore, is compatible with alternative procedural rules. In the bylaw article analysed, it can be seen how the shareholders create an alternative procedure to that which is outlined in law, stating that the company should exercise its preferential right to purchase "in a three month period counting from the notification of the seizure to the company". As a consequence of this alternative procedure, the company should exercise the right at the beginning of the seizure procedure (ie, in the phase prior to the suspension of the auction or adjudication).
The second item that should be mentioned is the bylaw's stipulation that the reference for the transfer price be "the book value on the balance sheet last approved by the Board" as a fair value for these types of transfer. The Corporate Enterprises Act or accounting rules set no specifications concerning the fair value of shares, expect for referring to a price set by an independent expert that can be appointed by the company itself (Article 107.2.d of the Corporate Enterprises Act) or the registrar (Article 353 of the Corporate Enterprises Act). Given the lack of criteria and bearing in mind that the accounting rules state that when companies are being valued "only approximations or reasonable judgments can be discussed", the Legal Affairs Department's decision considers that no rule prohibits it from agreeing that the value of the shares under the preferential purchase right should be the book value approved by the board.
For further information on this topic please contact Guillermo Donadeu at CMS Albiñana & Suarez de Lezo by telephone (+34 93 494 10 22) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org). The CMS Albiñana & Suarez de Lezo website can be accessed at www.cms.law.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.