We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
17 February 2003
Under Swiss law a share corporation must have a minimum capital of Sfr100,000, which can be paid in cash or in kind. In general, there are no limitations on what may be contributed in kind. However, the interests of the public, the company's creditors and other shareholders are protected by the following provisions:
In principle, this procedure is the same where the company intends to acquire assets from shareholders or third parties after its incorporation. In such cases the articles of incorporation must indicate the asset, the name of the contributor and the consideration to be given by the company (Article 628(2) of the Code of Obligations).
In a decision delivered on March 21 2002(1) the Supreme Court considered whether a company violated this provision by failing to indicate in its articles of incorporation that it intended to acquire a hotel complex shortly after its incorporation. The court ruled that the company was not in breach of the law since the articles of incorporation stated that the company's commercial purpose was the acquisition of real estate to develop hotels and other commercial buildings. The Supreme Court stated that the company's acquisition of the hotel complex was covered by the purpose of its incorporation, and therefore it was not in violation of Article 628(2) of the Code of Obligations.
An important legal question with regard to the sales contract is at which moment the risk of loss passes from the seller to the buyer of an object. With regard to movable goods, Swiss law follows the Roman-law principle of periculum est emptoris (ie, the risk is with the buyer). According to Article 185(1) of the Code of Obligations, benefit and risk with regard to the object of the purchase pass to the buyer upon conclusion of the contract, unless special circumstances or agreements create an exception. The buyer must thus pay the full price of the object, even if it perishes or deteriorates before delivery. This does not correspond with the transfer of ownership, which occurs only at the moment that the object is physically transferred. The provision has been criticized by legal commentators and is therefore restrictively interpreted.
In a recent case three parties - A, B and C - intended to incorporate a share corporation with a capital of Sfr100,000. A third party, D, was willing to finance the share capital and to subscribe to the shares. D agreed with the other three parties that after the company's incorporation, it would sell each of them back one company share a month. One and a half years after its incorporation, the company went bankrupt. On March 12 2002(2) the Supreme Court had to decide whether A, B and C were obliged to buy the remaining shares of the company. The Supreme Court saw no special circumstances in this case which justified making an exception from the principle of periculum est emptoris set out in Article 185. The funds which D provided were considered as a loan against the purchase price. Therefore, even though the company foundered after the conclusion of the contract, the buyers had to pay the price for its remaining shares.
As the principle of periculum est emptoris is always applied if no special
circumstances or agreements create an exception, it is highly recommended that
sales contracts concluded under Swiss law make express provision for the passing
of risk from seller to buyer.
For further information on this topic please contact Markus Doerig or Istok Egeter at Badertscher Dörig Poledna by telephone (+41 1 266 20 66) or by fax (+41 1 266 60 70) or by email (firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com). The Badertscher Doerig Poledna website can be accessed at www.bdp.ch.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.