Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Gide Loyrette Nouel

Tax Advantages from a Holdings Perspective

Newsletters

14 November 2008

Corporate Tax Hungary

Participation Exemption
Financing
Licensing
Tax Arrangements and Effects


The planned abolition of the 4% solidarity surtax from January 1 2009 would reduce the general Hungarian corporate income tax burden to 16%, one of the lowest tax rates in Europe (for further details please see "Abolition of Solidarity Surtax: New Opportunities for Holdings"). Although the abolition may not enter into force in 2009, a number of provisions in Hungarian tax legislation already favour various types of tax structure.

Participation Exemption

Under Hungary’s participation exemption regime, dividends flowing from entities other than controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) are exempt from corporate income tax and solidarity surtax (16% plus 4%), regardless of the entity’s home jurisdiction. The availability of this exemption was recently extended by significantly narrowing Hungary's CFC restrictions to exclude all EU member states, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries and Hungary’s treaty partners(1) from their adverse tax consequences.

The participation exemption is available not only for dividends received, but also for capital gains accrued on a non-CFC share of at least 30% (if held for at least one year and reported to the tax administration on acquisition). This provision favours corporate investors and participants in various corporate transformations and reorganizations.

Financing

In order to encourage related-party financing, a 50% notional deduction from intra-group interest spreads is allowed within certain limits,(2) which effectively results in a corporate income tax burden of only 8% (plus 4%).(3) This tax rate is almost unrivalled and can be further reduced by careful planning. Generally, this deduction is available if the interest payer makes a corresponding increase in its corporate income tax base. However, this restriction does not apply to cross-border interest payments.

In the opposite case, if a related-party interest expense exceeds the related-party interest income, 50% of the difference will be added to the corporate income tax base as a rule. However, an exemption can be sought if the relevant related parties that receive or pay interest are notified or if they are foreign entities falling outside the scope of Hungarian corporate income tax law.

Thus, the 50% intra-group financing regime is especially favourable for cross-border investments, including back-to-back financing arrangements, but can also be widely applied in Hungarian financing structures, as only a few types of interest (eg, discount securities) are excluded from the regime.

Licensing

A 50% notional deduction from the corporate income tax base may be applied to royalties received, whether or not the licensee is a related party. This regime can be used for back-to-back and other licensing arrangements. Unlike the intra-group interest flows described above, the full amount of inbound royalties in such arrangements - not just the spread - is exposed to the 8% plus 4% beneficial tax rates. Thus, outbound royalties can be fully offset against the normal 16% plus 4% tax base. Depending on the circumstances, profits generated on inbound and outbound royalty flows not only may be fully tax exempt, but also may lead to an overall tax saving.

Tax Arrangements and Effects

The table below demonstrates some possible combinations of financing, licensing and holding functions and their profit and loss elements, along with their tax effects.

1 2 3 4
Related interest received 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Related interest paid -900 -900 -900 -900
Royalties received 0 1,000 1,000 1,000
Royalties paid 0 -900 -900 -900
Dividends received 0 0 500 500
Other deductible costs 0 0 0 -200
Total pre-tax profit 100 200 700 500
50% intragroup interest regime (1,000 - 900) x 50% (1) -50 -50 -50 -50
50% royalties regime (1,000 x 50%) 0 -50 -300 -200
Dividends received (participation exemption) 0 0 -500 -500
Corporate income tax base 50 100 -150 -250
Corporate income tax (16%) 8 16 0 0
Solidarity surtax base (pre-tax profit minus dividends received) 100 200 200 0
Solidarity surtax (4%) 4 8 8 0
Total tax burden (corporate income tax plus solidarity surtax) 12 24 8 0
Effective tax rate 12% 12% 1.14% 0%

(1) The intra-group interest spread and the inbound royalty deductions are together capped at 50% of the pre-tax profit.

Scenarios 1 and 2 show that back-to-back financing and licensing arrangements can lead to an effective tax burden of 12%, comprising a reduced 8% corporate income tax rate and a normal 4% solidarity surtax rate. This 12% tax exposure can be further reduced through a combination of income elements. Scenario 3 shows that the participation exemption regime, which allows for the full deduction of non-CFC dividends received from both the corporate income tax and the solidarity surtax bases, allows for a significant tax reduction. Scenario 4 shows that a further reduction can be achieved by adding additional cost elements to the model.

Thus, a well-planned combination of various income and cost elements derived from different activities can reduce the effective Hungarian tax burden to close to zero.

For further information on this topic please Szabolcs Erdős at Gide Loyrette Nouel by telephone (+36 1 411 74 00) or by fax (+36 1 411 74 40) or by email (szabolcs.erdos@gide.com).

Endnotes

(1) Hungary has tax treaties with over 60 countries.

(2) The corporate income tax base reduction due to financing and licensing activities (along with certain other benefits) is capped at 50% of the pre-tax profit. The statutory 3:1 thin capitalization ratio should be observed when planning interest expenses.

(3) This scheme is under review by the European Commission, which is considering whether it constitutes an unacceptable form of state aid.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Author

Szabolcs Erdős

Szabolcs Erdős

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *