We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
01 March 2019
On 20 December 2018 the Federal Tax Service (FTS) approved a form of inquiry which it will use to request information from legal entities regarding their beneficial owners (Order ММВ-7-2/824).
In 2017 Federal Law 115-FZ on Suppressing the Legalisation (Laundering) of Proceeds from Crime and the Financing of Terrorism was amended to allow state authorities to request information regarding beneficial owners. Following the amendments:
For the purposes of the law, 'legal entities' means not only Russian legal entities, but also foreign legal entities, including those that perform economic operations in Russia and interact with Russian clients.
According to Federal Law 115-FZ, authorised bodies can request the following information regarding beneficial owners:
For the purposes of Federal Law 115-FZ, a 'beneficial owner of a legal entity' is defined as an individual who directly or indirectly (through third parties):
At present, the FTS is one of two authorised bodies in Russia with the right to request information regarding the beneficial owners of legal entities (with the other being Rosfinmonitoring, Russia's anti-money laundering authority).
Although the FTS did not previously have an approved form of inquiry to request information regarding beneficial owners, it did request such information from legal entities. Such requests were made in free form as part of document requests when conducting field tax audits. Now, such requests will also be sent to legal entities which are not being audited during the relevant period.
The FTS can request information regarding the beneficial owners of legal entities to, among other things, identify tax evasion schemes. The FTS has recently been active in applying the concept of an "actual recipient of income", as enshrined in Article 7(3) of the Tax Code. This concept is close to that of a beneficiary owner, which is common in international practice. In essence, if agreements on the avoidance of double taxation and the norms of domestic legislation provide for a tax exemption for a payment source, such exemption does not apply where the resident of another state who receives income acts as a figurehead for another entity that is actually the beneficiary of the income in question.
The FTS has emphasised that the application of the beneficial owner of income concept does not require it to determine the ultimate beneficiary of a legal entity. It is sufficient to establish that the ultimate beneficiary is not the nominal recipient of the income.
For further information on this topic please contact Valery Narezhniy at Gorodissky & Partners by telephone (+7 495 937 6116) or email (email@example.com). The Gorodissky & Partners website can be accessed at www.gorodissky.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.