We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
20 June 2018
There are many advantages to using independent contractors as part of a workforce. They often bring specialised expertise and tools, without the expectations of a long-term relationship. Further, they can parachute in and out of an organisation, setting their own schedules, taking on multiple projects and even bringing in their own employees to help. However, adjudicators, plaintiff lawyers and legislators are increasingly challenging employers that misclassify workers as independent contractors. Further, some adjudicators seem to have no problem with an individual reaping the benefits of being an independent contractor (typically, throughout the relationship) and later claiming to be an employee when it is advantageous to do so (typically, at the end of the relationship). A finding that a worker (or group of workers) has been misclassified can result in significant liability for an organisation.
The Ontario government is increasing the risks and penalties for employers that misclassify workers as independent contractors as part of the Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act 2017 (known as 'Bill 148'), which amends the Employment Standards Act 2000 (for further details please see "Once bitten, twice shy: greater scrutiny ahead for employees misclassified as contractors"). As a result, the burden is now on employers to prove that workers are not employees under the Employment Standards Act. This change of presumption will make it even more difficult for employers to defend claims filed by individuals challenging their status as an independent contractor in favour of being classified as an employee.
Bill 148 reverses the onus in misclassification cases under the Employment Standards Act. This means that if an Ontario contractor claims to be an employee for the purposes of the act – and therefore claims to be entitled to overtime, vacation pay or other relevant statutory entitlements – the employer will have the burden of proving that the contractor is not an employee.
There is no set formula for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor in Canada. Adjudicators will consider the relationship between the parties as a whole to determine whether workers are in business for themselves. The factors that are most commonly considered include:
Proving that a worker is not an employee can be particularly challenging for an employer that may not have access to information about the contractor's business (eg, whether the contractor has other sources of income or the tools that the contractor uses to perform the work).
Among the recommendations adopted by the Ontario government in Bill 148 was its special advisers' recommendation to increase the proactive enforcement powers of the Ministry of Labour. These proactive measures include:
To achieve this goal, the government has announced that it will be hiring up to 175 additional employment standards officers to assist with its enforcement efforts, and has increased the penalties payable by non-compliant employers in recent amendments to the Employment Standards Act Regulations.
Employers that are found by an employment standards officer to have contravened the Employment Standards Act by misclassifying an employee as an independent contractor may face penalties of C$350, C$700 and C$1,500 for the first, second and third contravention, respectively. If the contravention affects more than one employee, these penalties will be multiplied by the number of employees that have been affected. Employers that violate the act may also face prosecution. If convicted, fines can range between C$50,000 and C$500,000 depending on whether the conviction applies to an individual or corporation, and if it is a first, second or third offence.
In addition to monetary penalties, Bill 148 empowers the Ministry of Labour to publish the names of employers that fail to comply with the Employment Standards Act. This publicly available list will include:
Misclassification of contractors can lead to significant liability for employers, as these individuals can lay claim to, among other things:
These are all considered to be rights and entitlements of employees under employment standards legislation. Further, there may be consequences for unremitted:
Employees and dependent contractors may have common law entitlements on termination. The amendments to Bill 148 are expected to increase the past bias in favour of determination of employee status.
To minimise the risks for misclassifying individuals as independent contractors, employers should take a proactive approach, including reviewing existing relationships, by:
The changes to the Employment Standards Act reflect a growing concern among Canadian lawmakers that workers and employers are operating outside of the traditional employer-employee framework. With these changes, the number of misclassification cases brought against employers under employment standards legislation is likely to increase, and these cases should progress more quickly with the dramatic increase in enforcement officers. Copycat claims from plaintiff lawyers – including class actions – are also likely to increase, as other similar cases play out in the Canadian and US news media.
For further information on this topic please contact Ralph N Nero or Avneet Jaswal at Fasken by telephone (+1 416 366 8381) or email (email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). The Fasken website can be accessed at www.fasken.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.
Ralph N Nero