We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
29 August 2018
Proper policies, communications and investigations are key to dealing with workplace violence. Belyea v Syncrude Canada Ltd (2018 ABQB 132) involved a workplace altercation after a senior Syncrude employee found a junior employee sitting in his favourite lunchroom chair. After conducting an in-depth investigation, Syncrude fired the senior worker for cause. The worker then sued for wrongful dismissal.
Workplace violence is a serious concern for both employees and employers alike. Employees expect safe workplaces and employers have a concomitant duty to ensure their safety. Therefore, it is critical for employers to understand how to minimise workplace violence and respond if it arises. Syncrude's handling of this situation is exemplary and offers key lessons on how to address workplace aggression.
Mr Belyea worked for Syncrude for 10 years as a crane operator. During this time, he received positive performance reviews and was a valued employee. He was conscientious, diligent and committed to team goals.
However, Belyea had a history of workplace aggression:
In 2012 Belyea entered the lunchroom in which his favourite chair was stationed and discovered a junior employee sitting in the chair eating lunch out of a Tupperware container. Belyea told the employee to "get up" but the employee refused. Belyea threatened to start a scene. When the employee again refused to move, Belyea threw a bike chain and lock that he was carrying at the worker. The chain hit the employee's hand and broke his lunch container.
Following the incident, Syncrude conducted an investigation in which it:
Syncrude found that Belyea's credibility was poor and that he had breached the company's Treatment of Employees (TOE) Policy.
After the investigation, Syncrude held a termination hearing in which Belyea was again afforded an opportunity to discuss his conduct. He continued to deny his actions and refused to accept responsibility for what transpired. Syncrude decided to terminate Belyea for cause for breaching the TOE Policy.
In a wrongful dismissal suit, the employer bears the burden of proving that dismissal for cause is justified. The test is highly contextual and requires that an employer demonstrate:
Due to the importance of work to the livelihoods of employees, the court warned that caution must be exercised when terminating a worker for cause. Nevertheless, Syncrude's decision to terminate Belyea for cause was upheld on the following grounds:
These factors led the court to conclude that Belyea's conduct had undermined the employment relationship to the extent that a dismissal for cause was warranted.
The decision offers the following key lessons for employers:
For further information on this topic please contact Theodore Fong or Claire Himsl at Fasken by telephone (+1 403 837 0610) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com). The Fasken website can be accessed at www.fasken.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.