Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Stanchi Studio Legale

Mobbing claims: persecutory conduct must be intentional

Newsletters

27 January 2016

Employment & Immigration Italy


The Supreme Court has issued a decision (158/2016) concerning workplace harassment – so-called 'mobbing' – with specific attention to the intentionality of the persecutory conduct.

The case involved an employee who claimed against his employer for an injury that he alleged was related to the employer's mobbing conduct. In particular, the employee claimed that the injury derived from the employer having placed the employee on unemployment insurance and forcing him to take a short vacation.

The court noted that in order to be considered mobbing, the alleged misconduct must be sustained over a long period and occur with high frequency. Further, it must consist of a pattern of persecutory workplace behaviour undertaken by the employer as a form of 'psychological terrorism' with the intention of abusing the employee in multiple ways.

Case law has identified the following factors that must be present – and which the employee must prove – in order to make a workplace harassment claim for mobbing:

  • The persecutory conduct – regardless of its lawfulness – must be carried out against the employee in a systematic and vexatious way, and be sustained over a long period of time.
  • The conduct must be detrimental to the employee's mental or physical health.
  • A causal link must exist between the conduct of the employer or the employee's immediate superior and the damage to the employee's physical or mental health.
  • The persecutory conduct must be intentional.

In the case at hand, the Supreme Court upheld the appeal court's ruling that the employer's placement of the employee on unemployment insurance and order for him to take a short vacation did not constitute mobbing, because it could not be proven that the employer had clearly intended to marginalise and ostracise the employee in his working environment as a means of provoking him to resign. Without such evidence, the employer's liability could not be upheld.

For further information on this topic please contact Andrea Stanchi at Stanchi Studio Legale by telephone (+39 02 546 9522) or email (a.stanchi@stanchilaw.it).

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Author

Andrea Nicolò Stanchi

Andrea Nicolò Stanchi

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

More from this firm

  • Italy ratifies International Labour Organisation Violence and Harassment Convention
  • COVID-19: suspension of dismissals and extension of financial support and family leave
  • Temporary rules for redundancy
  • ECJ on paid leave in case of unlawful dismissal and reinstatement: Italian viewpoint
  • COVID-19: workplace health and safety

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *