We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
31 August 2015
On August 3 2015 the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its final Clean Power Plan, which establishes historic new standards and emission guidelines intended to reduce carbon pollution from power plants.(1) The EPA adopted the Clean Power Plan after considering input received through outreach to the power industry and its regulators, as well as over 4 million public comments submitted to the EPA. The plan includes several important changes from the proposed rule issued last year, including a new 'reliability safety valve' and extended compliance periods.(2) Notwithstanding the revisions, the Clean Power Plan presents sweeping new requirements for the energy industry and establishes the first-ever carbon emissions ceiling for power plants. The plan, which becomes effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, will affect power market participants across the generation base and will present significant compliance challenges, as well as market opportunities, should it ultimately survive expected legal challenges and come into force.
Specifically, the Clean Power Plan sets standards to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 32% from 2005 levels by 2030. These cuts represent a further 9% reduction to those announced in the proposed rule. The Clean Power Plan proposes interim and final target rates of CO2 emissions for each state. Progress towards meeting the target rates can be measured as rate-based (in pounds per megawatt hour), mass-based (in total short tons of CO2) or mass-based state goals with new source complement measured in total short tons of CO2.
The CO2 emissions target assumes how much a state could reduce emissions using three carbon-reducing measures, or 'building blocks', which the EPA has identified as the best system of emission reduction under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The building blocks are:
The EPA eliminated from the Clean Power Plan a potential fourth building block – increasing demand-side energy efficiency.
The Clean Power Plan's 'best system of emission reduction' analysis builds on current investments in renewable technologies, including greater reliance on new renewable energy than in the proposed rule, and takes into account recent reductions in the cost of clean energy technology. The analysis also indicates that assumed continued cost reductions for renewable energy and shifting generation away from coal may affect wholesale market prices. Specifically, the EPA's analysis indicates that shifting more generation from coal to natural gas would put upward pressure on power prices, but that replacing some existing generators with renewables would yield lower prices because of lower variable costs.
The Clean Power Plan includes guidelines for the states' development, submission and implementation of plans to reduce emissions. Each state is required to develop and implement a plan to ensure that the power plants in that state – individually or collectively and possibly in combination with other measures – achieve both the interim CO2 emissions performance rates over the period of 2022 to 2029 and final CO2 emission performance rates, rate-based goals or mass-based goals by 2030. States may choose between two plan types to meet their goals:
Coordination with several areas of federal and state government will be required in order to implement the Clean Power Plan fully. The following implementation elements are of particular interest:
The Clean Power Plan is anticipated to affect all major areas of the generation base.
Wind and solar
The Clean Energy Incentive Programme incentivises wind and solar projects which can be implemented relatively quickly. The White House has stated that renewable energy sources will account for 28% of the nation's capacity by 2030 – a large portion of which is anticipated to come from utility-scale wind and solar projects. Renewables expansion had previously been largely dependent on tax incentives, but the EPA has stated that the projected increase in renewables generation will happen even if the production tax credit for wind is not renewed. If the Clean Energy Incentive Programme alone is insufficient to incentivise investment in renewables, the government may consider implementing additional policies. These could include extending the wind production tax credit and the investment tax credit for solar generation – or putting in place another form of tax credit for renewables – through the start of the Clean Power Plan's compliance period in 2022.
The revised target of CO2 level reductions may come at the expense of natural gas. The EPA initially projected increased natural gas generation, but its updated analyses show relatively steady levels of generation from these assets. However, shifting from coal to natural gas generation is still one of the three remaining building blocks that the EPA has used to calculate its state-level targets, and many states may still emphasise that approach when crafting their compliance plans. The CO2 emission performance rates for existing natural gas combined cycle units is 771 pounds of CO2 per megawatt hour.
Ultimately, 1,000 fossil-fuel-fired generation plants with about 3,100 individual generating units will be covered by the Clean Power Plan, which sets source-specific CO2 emission performance rates of 1,305 pounds of CO2 per megawatt hour for existing coal units. Generation from coal is generally declining across the country and coal plant retirements are projected to continue increasing. This is in part because of other EPA regulations, such as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. The Clean Power Plan is thus arguably merely continuing an ongoing transition from coal to lower-emitting fuel sources.
New nuclear plant construction, as is occurring in the southeastern United States, can be incorporated into state implementation plans and count towards compliance targets. Nuclear plant uprates (increasing actual power output from an existing nuclear plant) may also be included. However, maintaining and extending the life of existing nuclear plants is not incentivised under the Clean Power Plan.
Consistent with other types of renewable energy, new hydropower generating capacity installed after 2012 can be used to meet states' targets under the plan. Hydropower uprates also count towards compliance.
Along with the Clean Power Plan, the EPA concurrently proposed the Federal Implementation Plan, for implementing the requirements of the Clean Power Plan in states that fail to submit an approvable state plan.(4) The proposed Federal Implementation Plan ultimately relies on a carbon credit marketplace, setting forth two distinct trading programmes – mass based or rate based – of which the EPA plans to finalise only one. The Federal Implementation Plan is intended to be adopted by states that do not have their own approvable plan and provides model rules from which states can develop presumptively approvable state plans, which can also be linked with other similar state plans and any federal plan for trading purposes. The EPA expects to complete the Federal Implementation Plan in 2016 after receiving feedback from states and other parties. The EPA will accept comments on the proposed Federal Implementation Plan for 90 days following its publication in the Federal Register.
States and affected industry participants will inevitably mount legal challenges to the Clean Power Plan. Among other legal theories, they may claim that Congress never authorised the EPA under the Clean Air Act to encourage emission-control methods that lie outside the 'fenceline' of a power plant, such as changing the dispatch of natural gas and increased renewable energy use. The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled on June 9 2015 that a group of private corporations and state governments could not challenge the regulation before the EPA released the final version of the Clean Power Plan.(5)
The Clean Power Plan will ultimately strengthen a fast-growing trend towards lower-emitting energy. In the days and years ahead, the Clean Power Plan will loom large, as subject states decide on steps towards complying (or not complying), and resulting shifts begin to manifest across the power sector.
For further information on this topic please contact Patrick E Groomes, Joseph Williams or Jonathan S Franklin at Norton Rose Fulbright's Washington DC office by telephone (+1 202 662 0200) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). Alternatively, please contact Edward Clark Lewis at Norton Rose Fulbright's Houston office by telephone (+1 713 651 5151) or email (email@example.com). The Norton Rose Fulbright website can be accessed at www.nortonrosefulbright.com.
(3) EPA-DOE-FERC Coordination on Implementation of the Clean Power Plan (August 3 2015), available at www.ferc.gov/media/headlines/2015/CPP-EPA-DOE-FERC.pdf.
(4) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Plan Requirements for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electric Utility Generating Units Constructed on or Before January 8 2014; Model Trading Rules; Amendments to Framework Regulations (issued August 3 2015, Federal Register citation pending).
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.