We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
18 March 2019
The transport sector is especially important for reducing worldwide greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. This is also the case in Austria. According to the federal minister for sustainability and tourism, "strengthening e-mobility is an essential instrument for achieving these goals".(1) As such, e-mobility is a core element of the Austrian climate and energy strategy.(2)
One of the main strategies to reduce air pollutants (eg, nitrogen dioxide) under the Air Immission Protection Act(3) is the introduction of speed restrictions on motorways and expressways to minimise air pollutant emissions from diesel and petrol cars.(4) The speed limits introduced under the act are based on the legal authorisation of the federal state governors in Section 14 of the act.(5) These actions have been taken in order to comply with the thresholds defined in the EU Air Quality Directive.(6)
Arguably, it seems that electric vehicles – which do not emit carbon dioxide while in operation – should not be affected by these speed limits. However, the Constitutional Court disagrees.
In its latest decision on this matter, the Constitutional Court dealt with a complaint by an electric vehicle owner who had exceeded an Air Immission Protection Act speed limit.(7) The driver claimed that his electric vehicle emitted no air pollutants and that the emission-dependent speed limit for the applicable section of the A1 West motorway(8) imposed by the governor of Upper Austria's ordinance did not apply to him. He further claimed that the ordinance was unconstitutional, since it did not differentiate between individual vehicle categories and their respective emissions.
The Constitutional Court disagreed, holding that the state governor could issue an ordinance based on the Air Immission Protection Act that set a uniform speed limit for emissions, regardless of the vehicle type. The court based its decision on a 2011 ruling,(9) under which equal treatment of different types of vehicle was acceptable in view of the increased safety risk associated with different speed limits for different vehicle types. In addition, it should be assumed that different speed limits for passenger cars (eg, hybrid, natural gas and electric vehicles) would not only impair the flow of traffic and thus endanger road safety, but would also lead to an uneven speed curve. According to the Constitutional Court, this would at least partially lessen the emission-reducing effect of the speed limit.(10)
The electric vehicle owner's complaint was therefore rejected.
In response to the Constitutional Court's decision, it was necessary to create a legal exception for electric cars.
As part of the environmental package that recently came into force in Austria (the Aarhus Participation Act),(11) electric vehicles were exempted from the speed requirements set out in the Air Immission Protection Act.(12) As such, vehicles powered purely by electricity or hydrogen fuel cell technology are now exempt from the speed limits set for certain sections of motorways and expressways. In future, electric vehicles will be able to drive at 130 km/h in these zones. In Austria, this applies to a total of 440km of road.
The newly added exception to the Air Immission Protection Act for electric cars applies only if the relevant section of motorway or expressway is marked with a sign indicating the exception. The electric car must also have special licence plates, which features green lettering on a white background.
From a technical standpoint, it is still questionable whether electric cars can drive longer distances at 130km/h. Thus, the welcome legal exception will likely be of greater importance in future.
In this way, the federal government has created the legal framework to enable the federal states, which are responsible for measures under the Air Immission Protection Act, to implement these exceptions. Whether all federal states will introduce an exception to the act's speed limits for electric cars is still unclear. It remains to be seen whether the governors will apply the exception. According to early statements, some federal states do not wish to do so.(13)
To achieve the climate targets and reduce air pollution, further incentives for participation in the e-mobility offensive are being discussed (eg, opening bus lanes and promoting free parking for electric cars).(14)
For further information on this topic please contact Christoph Jirak or Sandra Kasper at Schoenherr by telephone (+43 1 53 43 70), or email (email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org ). The Schoenherr website can be accessed at www.schoenherr.eu.
(2) https://mission2030.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Klima-Energiestrategie.pdf; Lighthouse 3: E-Mobility Offensive, Page 67ff.
(5) According to this, the provincial governors can set speed limits in their provinces for certain sections of the high-level road network (motorways and expressways), which are necessary due to the local, topographical, meteorological and air pollutant-relevant conditions for the prevention of the exceedance of thresholds for air pollutants.
(7) VfGH 23 February 2017, E 70/2017-10; the complainant had driven at 115 km/h instead of the permitted 100 km/h. Although the complainant only received an admonition, he nevertheless took legal action.
(12) This was done by means of a change in the plenum of the National Council against the original draft. See www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/BR/I-BR/I-BR_10031/fname_717210.pdf, Article 2, Section 8.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.