We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
16 December 2013
In a recent decision the Federal Court found the COHIBA trademarks for cigars and cigarillos to be well known and iconic in Canada based primarily on expert evidence establishing use of the brand in media, including film, television, music and print. This led the court to conclude that the fame of the brand extended beyond cigar smokers and to reject an application to register the trademark LAZARO COHIBA for use in association with rum, despite the differences in wares and trades.
Tequila Cuervo applied to register LAZARO COHIBA based on proposed use in Canada in association with "alcoholic beverages, namely rum". This application was opposed by Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco, trading also as Corporation Habanos . The main ground of opposition was that the applied-for mark was confusing with Habanos' word mark COHIBA and COHIBA and design mark (depicted below), registered for use in association with tobacco, including cigars.
The only evidence filed by Habanos before the registrar of trademarks to establish use and reputation of the COHIBA trademarks in Canada was "steady and not insubstantial" sales figures for 1994 to1999. The registrar rejected Habanos' opposition, concluding that the wares and trades of the parties were different and that, while the COHIBA trademarks had been used in Canada for many years, they were known to some extent only by a relatively small group of purchasers of cigars.
On appeal, the Federal Court concluded that the COHIBA trademark was well known "to the point of being iconic—outside its sphere of users, and in the general knowledge of the public". This finding was based on additional expert evidence introduced by Habanos on appeal showing that the COHIBA brand had been referenced widely in film, television, music and other media, such as print and magazines distributed in the United States and Canada. Habanos also adduced expert evidence establishing that smokers are more likely consumers of alcohol products, and that there is a relationship in their mind between these products.
No additional evidence was filed by Habanos in the appeal to supplement its limited sales figures filed before the registrar. As a result, the court had only the same "not insignificant" sales figures for 1994 to1999 – that is, almost 15 years prior to its decision.
Despite this and the fact that the court noted that Habanos could have done more to establish direct knowledge of the COHIBA brand by carrying out a survey of Canadian consumers, the court was satisfied by the strength of the expert evidence. It further noted that there was no doubt that television shows referred to in that evidence, such as Sex and the City and The Simpsons, were widely seen by Canadians.
Hence, the court essentially concluded that the trademark was well known, iconic and famous based primarily upon expert evidence showing its use in films, television shows and other media, despite having limited evidence of actual use of the trademark in the marketplace and no evidence showing direct knowledge by consumers.
This decision is a welcome development for trademark owners which are in a position to show use of their brand in popular culture because of product placement or otherwise, and which could now use this evidence in Canadian opposition or infringement proceedings to establish a brand's reputation and strengthen its scope of protection.
Cuervo has appealed the Federal Court's decision.
For further information on this topic please contact Jean-Sébastien Dupont at Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh's Montreal office by telephone (+1 514 954 1500), fax (+1 514 954 1396) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org). The Smart & Biggar website can be accessed at www.smart-biggar.ca.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.