We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
19 December 2016
This case is one of the Top 10 IP Cases of the Year (2015) selected and summarised by the Supreme People's Court. This update provides an edited translation of the court's case summary and significance, as well as brief commentary as appropriate.
The Beijing High People's Court recently upheld a decision to prohibit further production or distribution of a television series that was found to constitute copyright infringement.
In October 1992 Zhe Chen (陈喆), a romance fiction author, wrote a script titled Plum Blossom Sear (《梅花烙》) under the pseudonym Qiong Yao (琼瑶). Although the script was never formally published, Yi Ren Communication Co Ltd adapted it for a television drama series called Plum Blossom Sear of 21 episodes. The series premiered in Taiwan on October 13 1993 and was broadcast in mainland China on the Hu Nan television station. Its content was almost identical to the original script.
The script was also adapted into a novel of the same title. After its completion on June 30 1993, the novel was published under Chen's name, first in Taiwan on September 15 1993 and later in mainland China. The main plot of the novel was consistent with that of the script.
On June 17 2012 Zheng Yu completed a script for 20 episodes of a television drama series titled The Palace 3: The Lost Daughter (《宫锁连城》). The script was published under the author's name on April 8 2014 and two versions of the series were filmed:
Chen brought an action against the first section of the The Palace 3: The Lost Daughter script, claiming that it constituted infringement of copyright of her Plum Blossom Sear script, despite differences in characters and plot.
The Beijing Number 3 Intermediate People's Court found that the defendant's adaptation constituted copyright infringement and ordered that:
The Beijing High People's Court upheld this decision.(1)
This case attracted a lot of attention as it explained the methodology and criteria for finding 'material similarity' between literary works, and instructed on how to differentiate an idea from an expression in terms of plot selection, advancement and structure. The court's decision in this case highlights the purpose of the Copyright Law to protect original works and the judiciary's policy to enhance IP protection, which is crucial to the development of culture and film.
For further information on this topic please contact Hui Huang, Paul Ranjard, Huimin Qin or Nan Jiang at Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency by telephone (+86 10 6892 1000) or email (email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). The Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency website can be accessed at www.wanhuida.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.