Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Vellani & Vellani

Proposed amendments to Patents Ordinance

Newsletters

27 May 2019

Intellectual Property Pakistan

Introduction
Proposed amendments
Comment



Introduction

In order to integrate and upgrade Pakistan's IP infrastructure, improve its services, public awareness and IP enforcement, the Intellectual Property Office recently proposed draft amendments to the Patents Ordinance 2000 on its website. The amendments aim to:

  • align the ordinance with the Intellectual Property Organisation of Pakistan Act 2012;
  • standardise office practices; and
  • streamline procedures.

Proposed amendments

The proposed amendments include the following:

  • Section 23, which concerns filing oppositions against a patent, will be deleted. Accordingly, Section 21 will be amended with regard to the publication of patent applications and registrations, which would allow the controller to publish the complete specification along with additional information regarding:
    • the registration number;
    • the registration date;
    • the assigned international patent classification; and
    • the accepted priorities without inviting public opposition.
  • A new clause (f) will be added to Section 7(4) of the ordinance concerning 'patentable inventions'. Section 7(4) deals with the granting of patents and clause (f) specifies that a patent will not be granted for drugs and medicines where:

the mere discovery of a new form or new property of a known substance which does not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance or the mere discovery of any new property.

Moreover, under clause (f):

salts, esters, ethers, polymorphs, metabolites, pure form, particle size, isomers, mixtures of isomers, complexes, combinations, solvates, pro-drugs, hydrates, N-oxides, analogs and other derivatives of a known substance shall be considered to be the same substance, unless they differ significantly in properties with regard to efficacy.

  • A new Section 46A concerning the formation of a board of appeal has been proposed consisting of a chair and legal and technical members appointed by the Intellectual Property Office.
  • A new Section 46B concerning the board's powers and procedures has been proposed. The board will have full powers to hear, confirm or set aside the controller's decisions, including rejecting or granting patent applications and imposing penalties for patent applications. The board will be deemed a civil court under Sections 480 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 and all proceedings before it will be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860).
  • A new Clause (1a) of Section 16 concerning patent applications has been proposed. Under Section 16(1a), the controller would be able to consult agencies or firms notified by the Intellectual Property Office to process patent applications for one or more acts, including examinations for patentability, novelty searches or the digitisation of patent applications.

Comment

The proposed amendments have been published on the Intellectual Property Office's website for public comment but have yet to be finalised.

For further information on this topic please contact Seema S Mansoor or Erum Rasheed at Vellani & Vellani by telephone (+92 21 3580 1000) or email (seema.mansoor@vellani.com or erum.rasheed@vellani.com). The Vellani & Vellani website can be accessed at www.vellani.com.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Seema S Mansoor

Seema S Mansoor

Erum Rasheed

Erum Rasheed

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

More from this firm

  • Generic trademarks and deceptive marketing practices: Competition Commission rejects genericism defence
  • Salient features of Geographical Indications (Registration and Protection) Act
  • Patent owners' rights under Patents Ordinance 2000
  • Registered trademark deleted from trademark register for non-use
  • Intellectual Property Tribunal vacates interim injunction in trademark case

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *