Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
NAM & NAM

Treble damages now available for trademark and design infringement

Newsletters

09 November 2020

Intellectual Property South Korea

Introduction
Enhanced damages (trademarks and designs)
Royalty rate used in damage calculations (trademarks and designs)
Statutory damages (trademarks)


Introduction

Amendments to the Trademark Act and the Design Protection Act effective from 20 October 2020 have added support for treble damages in certain infringement scenarios. The amendments are effective immediately and apply to acts of infringement conducted after 20 October 2020.

Prior to the amendments, damage compensation available to rights holders was generally calculated based on:

  • profits lost by the rights holder due to the infringement;
  • profits obtained by the infringer based on the infringement; or
  • ordinarily expected royalties.

However, this system has flaws. Namely, in the case of the first bullet, damages are limited to the rights holder's sales capacity (ie, the damages cannot exceed that which the rights holder could have sold, even if the infringer committed significantly more infringement) – this is problematic especially where the infringer is a larger-scale entity than the rights holder. In the case of the second bullet, damage calculation can be affected by a non-cooperative infringer providing insufficient financial data.

These amendments follow similar changes to the Patent Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act relating to wilful patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation which came into effect in July 2019 (for further details please see "Patentee protection strengthened in series of revisions to patent law").

There are also changes to the way that royalties are determined in damage calculations and the statutory damages available in trademark infringement cases. This article examines the amendments in detail.

Enhanced damages (trademarks and designs)

The new provision allows the courts to multiply the damages calculated by one of the existing methods up to threefold in cases of intentional (wilful) infringement, going some way to alleviate the inherent shortcomings described above. In determining the multiplier, the following factors must be considered:

Trademarks

Designs

The degree to which the distinctiveness or reputation of the infringed trademark has been tarnished.

The degree of intent or the extent to which the infringer was aware of the potential damage.

The amount of damage suffered by the trademark holder or exclusive licensee due to the infringement.

The economic benefits gained by the infringer.

The period and frequency of the infringement.

The fine for infringement.

The infringer's economic status.

The degree of effort that the infringer made to alleviate damage.

Whether the infringer is in a position of superiority.

The degree of intent or the extent to which the infringer was aware of the potential damage.

The amount of damage suffered by the design rights holder or exclusive licensee due to the infringement.

The economic benefits gained by the infringer.

The period and frequency of the infringement.

The fine for infringement.

The infringer's economic status.

The degree of effort that the infringer made to alleviate damage.

In trademark infringement cases, wilfulness is presumed when the fact of trademark registration is displayed. Specifically, any person who has infringed trademark rights or the exclusive licence of another person who indicates that the trademark in question is registered will be presumed to have been aware that the trademark was already registered, in relation to their infringement (for further details please see "IP marking: risks and benefits").

Royalty rate used in damage calculation (trademarks and designs)

There has also been criticism aimed at the ordinarily expected royalties damage calculation method in that it is not always possible or appropriate to determine an ordinarily expected royalty (eg, where there is no standard royalty rate or where an average rate may not apply to the case in question).

The amendment changes this wording from "ordinarily expected" to "reasonably expected", allowing for a calculation based on factors relevant to the specific case, rather than being based on existing precedent.

Statutory damages (trademarks)

Instead of calculated damages, trademark rights owners have been able to claim statutory legal damages since 2011 up to a capped limit W50 million (approximately $42,500). This offers a way to claim damages from an infringer with a reduced burden to prove actual monetary damages incurred, instead allowing the court to determine the appropriate compensation based on the facts of the case.

In consideration of changing market conditions and inflation, this cap has now been raised to W100 million (approximately $85,000) in cases of negligent infringement and up to W300 million (approximately $255,000) in cases of intentional infringement.

For further information on this topic please contact Ben Yuu or Jonathan Masters at NAM & NAM by telephone (+82 2 753 5477) or email (byuu@nampat.co.kr or jonathan@nampat.co.kr). The NAM & NAM website can be accessed at www.nampat.co.kr.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Ben Yuu

Ben Yuu

Jonathan Masters

Jonathan Masters

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

Today's articles

  • Protection of photographic works - Taiwan
  • Trademark co-ownership finally possible in Brazil - Brazil
  • Promotion of patented inventions during COVID-19 pandemic - Peru
  • Punitive damages highlighted in new judicial interpretation on food safety - China
  • Trademark procedure and practice FAQs: post-registration stage - Nigeria

More articles

More from this firm

  • Patent Court takes issue with ex officio examination of trial request validity
  • KIPO measures to prevent online counterfeits
  • Doctrine of equivalents: recent developments
  • Relying on KIPO to combat infringement
  • Considerations when establishing South Korean patent portfolios

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *