We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
21 January 2019
Keyword advertising is a popular way for companies to increase their online exposure. Offered by search engine service providers, it involves the use of keywords in search terms which trigger the appearance of specific ads on search engine results pages. To ensure that ads remain relevant for web users, companies can employ a 'keyword insertion' feature, which updates the keywords that cause their ads to appear. However, the question remains as to whether a company's use of a competitor's trademark as a keyword in their keyword advertising constitutes trademark infringement.
Under Taiwan's current practice, determining whether the use of a competitor's trademark in keyword advertising constitutes trademark infringement depends on how the mark is used.
In general, the courts deem the use of a trademark non-actionable if it does not appear in the ad itself (ie, someone using the search terms would not assume that the ads belongs to the trademark owner). However, even if a competitor's trademark is not used in a company's ad, its use as a keyword in keyword advertising might be considered a violation of the Fair Trade Act.
In a recent trademark infringement case, the Taipei District Court upheld the established case law on this issue.
The complainant, a manufacturer of female undergarments, alleged that:
However, the defendant argued that:
In its decision, the Taipei District Court held that:
The court further suggested that, even if the ad had caused initial interest confusion and directed users to click the link, they would be able to identify that the website belonged to the defendant because it did not contain the complainant's trademark.
As the use of the trademark could not be seen by search engine users, the court held that its use in keyword advertising was non-actionable and that the defendant was not liable for trademark infringement.
For further information on this topic please contact Ruey-Sen Tsai or Celia Tao at Lee and Li Attorneys at Law by telephone (+886 2 715 3300) or email (email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). The Lee and Li Attorneys at Law website can be accessed at www.leeandli.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.