We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
27 September 2011
Although judges have full discretion, the general rule in Irish court cases is that the loser pays the winner's legal costs.
The 2010 Planning Act radically changed this rule for judicial review proceedings relating to decisions that give effect to the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive and the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive. The new default rule for these legal proceedings is that each party must bear its own costs, subject to four limited exceptions. The new costs rule is currently being challenged in proceedings before the Commercial Court.
The 2011 Planning Act extends the costs rule and its exceptions to certain other environmental cases.
The Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters lays down rules to promote citizens' involvement in environmental decision making. The convention, and the European rules that implement it, states that the public must be allowed to appeal decisions, and that any appeal procedure must be "fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive".
The minister stated, on the advice of the attorney general, that in order for Ireland to ratify the convention, it was necessary to:
New costs rule
The 2011 act extends the rule that each party must pay its own costs to environmental court cases where proceedings are instituted to ensure compliance with environmental licences or permits, or in respect of a breach of a licence or permit, if the circumstances have caused (or are likely to cause) damage to the environment.
For example, the new costs rule now applies to injunction proceedings enforcing compliance with the following:
The new rule does not apply to court cases seeking damages for breach of environmental licences or permits (eg, negligence actions for damage to the environment). Nor does the rule apply to proceedings undertaken by a statutory body or a minister.
New exception to the rule
The 2010 Planning Act sets out four limited exceptions to the rule that each party must pay its own legal costs. The court can award costs against a party if:
The 2011 act introduces a new exception: the court has discretion to award a party which successfully prosecutes legal proceedings all or a portion of its legal costs from the defendant, if the defendant is at fault.
Exceptions to the rule: environmental court cases
The 2011 act mirrors the existing exceptions for recovering costs in environmental court cases and the new exception. Potential defendants in environmental court cases include state body decision makers, licence/permit holders and facilities operators.
Given that the costs rule introduced by the 2010 Planning Act has led to court challenges, it remains to be seen how the amendment to, and extension of, the new legal costs rule to other environmental cases will be received.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.