Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Matheson

Defender v HSBC: impact of settling with one concurrent wrongdoer

Newsletters

23 April 2019

Litigation Ireland


The December 2018 High Court decision in Defender v HSBC Institutional Trust Services DAC highlighted the need for plaintiffs to understand the blameworthiness of all wrongdoers before settling a claim against any of the wrongdoers.(1) This case concerned Defender, a fund which invested with Bernard Madoff and subsequently suffered a loss when Madoff was revealed to be operating the world's largest Ponzi scheme.

When Madoff's Ponzi scheme was uncovered, the US Securities Investor Protection Corporation appointed a trustee to manage Madoff's bankruptcy. Defender made a claim in the US bankruptcy and settled its claim with the US trustee as against Madoff and his company. HSBC argued that this settlement had the effect of eliminating Defender's claim against HSBC by virtue of the Civil Liability Act.

Mr Justice Twomey held that Sections 17(2) and 35(1)(h) of the Civil Liability Act 1961 had the effect of associating the plaintiff (Defender) with the actions of the wrongdoer with whom it had settled (Madoff), and reducing the claim against the defendant (HSBC) by the amount which the other wrongdoer would have been liable to contribute to the defendant, had it paid the plaintiff's total claim. In this case, as Madoff was 100% blameworthy, the effect of the settlement was to reduce Defender's claim against HSBC to zero.

For further information on this topic please contact Sharon Daly at Matheson by telephone (+353 1 232 2000) or email(sharon.daly@matheson.com). The Matheson website can be accessed atwww.matheson.com.

Endnotes

(1) Further information is available here.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Author

Sharon Daly

Sharon Daly

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

More from this firm

  • Recent rulings on state aid
  • Delay in professional negligence claims
  • Discovery process reaches crisis point: Supreme Court to consider reform

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *