We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
23 May 2018
A recent decision of the Genoa Court of Appeal dealt with – among other things – two interesting issues arising under the London International Convention on Salvage 1989:
The judgment will be of interest not only to Italian lawyers, but also to practitioners from all of the states parties to the convention.
In the early hours of November 5 2008, a vessel was contemporaneously assisted by two tugs.
One of the salvors brought proceedings against the owner of the assisted vessel, claiming remuneration for salvage.
With regard to the first issue above, the Tribunal of Savona held that the value of the cargo on board should also have been taken into account, as it would have been the defendant's responsibility to prove that the cargo did not belong to it, but to third parties.
With regard to the second issue, the tribunal determined the totality of the salvage remuneration as 100, apportioned three quarters to the claimant and one quarter to the other co-salvor on the basis of their respective merits and accordingly ordered the defendant to pay 75% of the total amount to the claimant.
The defendant appealed on the ground (among others) that the judge had erred in taking into account the value of the cargo.
The claimant appealed on the ground (among others) that the judge had erred in apportioning a share of the salvage reward to the other co-salvor in the absence of any request from the latter.
With regard to consideration of the value of the cargo on board, the Court of Appeal reversed the tribunal's decision. The court referred to Article 13.2 of the convention, which provides that "payment of a reward fixed according to paragraph 1 shall be made by all of the vessel and other property interest in proportion to their respective salved values".
Therefore, the court held that it would have been for the claimant to demonstrate that the cargo on board belonged to the defendant. In the absence of any evidence of this, the defendant – as owner of the salved vessel – had only to pay a reward on the basis (among others) of the value of the salved ship and not of the cargo on board.
With regard to the apportionment of the salvage reward, the Court of Appeal affirmed the tribunal's decision, holding that:
"Article 15 (headed 'apportionment between salvors') expressly provides that the reward to be determined under Article 13 shall be apportioned between co-salvors, thus providing that it belongs to each of them in proportion to the utility of their services, it being irrelevant that one of them may not claim it and it not being the case that, in such a situation, the other salvors' share might be increased."
The Court of Appeal's decision is to be welcomed on both counts.
With regard to consideration of the value of the cargo on board, the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeal is certainly in line with the rationale of Article 13.2, which provides that the owner of the ship and the owner of the cargo should not be jointly and severally liable for payment of the salvage reward, but should contribute pro rata to the reward amount. Further, the rule laid down by the Tribunal of Savona – according to which it is for the owner of the salved vessel to rebut the presumption that it also owns the property on board – seems redolent of a bygone age, when merchants carried their own goods by their own ships.
With regard to the apportionment of the salvage reward, the court clearly followed a literal interpretation of Article 15.1, as it was entitled to do under Article 31.1 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. In fact, Article 15.1 makes reference to 'salvors' in apportioning the reward, and not 'claimants'.
For further information on this topic please contact Marco Manzone or Federico Modugno at Dardani Studio Legale by telephone (+39 010 576 1816) or email (email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). The Dardani Studio Legale website can be accessed at www.dardani.it.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.