Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print

Analytic phase of NTSB investigations

Newsletters

10 February 2021

Shipping & Transport USA

Party submissions of proposed findings and recommendations
Meetings with NTSB members


The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigates aviation, railroad, highway, marine and pipeline accidents to determine their probable cause and issues safety recommendations to reduce the risk of future accidents. This article considers the analytic phase of NTSB investigations, which follows the factual phase.(1)

Party submissions of proposed findings and recommendations

Parties to an NTSB investigation can submit proposed findings and recommendations. The five presidentially-appointed NTSB 'members' review these submissions in conjunction with the draft accident report from the NTSB staff.

NTSB investigations make use of working groups to focus on different aspects of an accident. Each working group comprises a chair from the NTSB, additional NTSB investigators and a representative from each party. These party representatives must have technical expertise in the working group's focus area and cannot be lawyers.

Typically, a party has 30 days from the finalisation of the last working group factual report to submit its proposed findings and recommendations. The level of detail warranted in these documents directly relates to the open and material issues in the investigation. If the probable cause of the accident is hotly contested, the marshalling of the facts in the proposed findings and recommendations can be extensive. Conversely, if a party largely agrees with the content of the group factual reports, the probable cause is largely agreed (even if not formally discussed) and the overall internal belief is that the company has been fairly represented in the safety culture interviews, the proposed findings and recommendations may be less comprehensive.

It is important that a party's proposed findings and recommendations discuss any changes in the company's policies and procedures intended to prevent future similar accidents or improve the company's safety culture.

Meetings with NTSB members

Once a party is informed of the date of the NTSB meeting at which the incident will be discussed, it should attempt to schedule individual meetings with NTSB members in the preceding weeks in order to discuss its proposed findings and recommendations. This will give the members an opportunity to ask the company questions if there are any discrepancies between the NTSB staff's draft accident report and the party's submission. It also provides the members with an opportunity to personalise the company. The party's coordinator, senior safety management and president, CEO or chair should attend.

Due to the 'Sunshine Act', these member meetings must take place individually with each member. The meetings are typically limited to one hour, with the member, their special assistant and often one of the senior members of the NTSB modal office in attendance.

For further information on this topic please contact Thomas Tobin or Daniel Braude at Wilson Elser by telephone (+1 914 262 2891 or +1 212 564 2522) or email (thomas.tobin@wilsonelser.com or daniel.braude@wilsonelser.com). The Wilson Elser website can be accessed at www.wilsonelser.com.

Endnotes

(1) This is the fourth article in a series on NTSB investigations. For earlier articles in the series, please see:

  • "Overview of National Transportation Safety Board investigations";
  • "Anticipating NTSB investigations – how best to prepare"; and
  • "Factual phase of NTSB investigations".

Further details are available here.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Thomas Tobin

Thomas Tobin

Daniel Braude

Daniel Braude

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

Today's articles

  • Supreme Court hands down judgment in its first collision case - United Kingdom
  • New York legislation regulating use of e-bicycles and e-scooters - USA
  • New regulation makes waves: Coastguard establishes maximum speed for stretch of Parana River - Argentina

More articles

More from this firm

  • Final phase of NTSB investigations
  • Factual phase of NTSB investigations
  • Anticipating NTSB investigations – how best to prepare
  • Congress confirms that Jones Act applies to offshore wind farm activities
  • Overview of National Transportation Safety Board investigations

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *