Canada, Fasken updates

Employment & Benefits

Contributed by Fasken
Thirty-month notice of termination ruling overturned
  • Canada
  • 16 October 2019

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently reaffirmed that the upper limit for reasonable notice remains 24 months, absent exceptional circumstances. This decision is a reminder of the importance of well-drafted employment contracts, particularly with regard to an employee's entitlements on termination.

If it looks like a farm and acts like a farm... it's a farm: farm worker exemption
  • Canada
  • 09 October 2019

Ontario's Divisional Court recently found that a farm's employees were exempt from the overtime provisions of the Employment Standards Act 2000. The court's decision is now the leading authority on the farm exemption and provides critical clarity to the farming community, which often relies on overtime work to produce agricultural products. It also provides guidance on the interpretation of employment standards legislation.

Upcoming federal elections: employees' right to vote
  • Canada
  • 02 October 2019

The Canada Elections Act provides that every employee who is an elector is entitled to three consecutive hours off work to vote. With election day looming, employers may be wondering what their obligations are towards their employees. This article sets out those obligations as well as employees' rights in this regard.

What's in a tweet? Employer does not have to pay settlement funds after grievor takes to Twitter
  • Canada
  • 25 September 2019

In a recent case, the arbitrator found that the employer need not pay the agreed settlement funds because the grievor's tweets breached the settlement's confidentiality provisions. This case is an important reminder of the significance of confidentiality in the settlement of labour disputes and the need to include clear and unequivocal confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements.

Constructively dismissed? Maybe, but get back to work
  • Canada
  • 18 September 2019

A recent decision reaffirms that employees must return to work following a constructive dismissal to mitigate the damages that they caused where doing so would not be embarrassing, humiliating or degrading. In such cases, employers should consider whether it is appropriate to re-offer an employee the opportunity to return to work following an allegation of constructive dismissal, as this could greatly limit the damages and their potential liability in litigation.


Current search