Intellectual Property updates


Contributed by Wanhuida Peksung IP Group
China promulgates 2018 national IP action plan
  • China
  • 18 February 2019

The Office of the Inter-ministerial Joint Meeting for Implementation of the National IP Strategy recently promulgated the Action Plan for Furthering the National IP Strategy and IP Rights Powerhouse Initiative 2018. The action plan offers few new proposals and instead reiterates the major IP initiatives which the government has promoted over the past two years, including institutional and judicial reform, a legislative plan and various national enforcement campaigns.


Contributed by IP Law Galli
Court of Milan clarifies retrospective effects of patent limitation during civil proceedings
  • Italy
  • 18 February 2019

The Court of Milan Companies and IP Specialised Division recently found three companies guilty of infringing a patent owned by Saima Sicurezza. The patent was held to be valid based on claims that the owner had made during the course of the proceedings under an application for limitation under Article 79 of the Industrial Property Code. This decision further aligns the Italian legal system with its EU counterpart and confirms Italian judges' attention to detail and reliability in patent cases.


Contributed by AKD NV
Hema crocodile takes bite out of Lacoste trademark
  • Netherlands
  • 18 February 2019

The Hague District Court recently issued a preliminary ruling in which it held that Lacoste could not invoke its famous crocodile trademark in order to prohibit the use of a crocodile motif on children's underwear. This preliminary judgment is one of only a few examples in which the use of a sign has been considered purely decorative (and thus could not be perceived as trademark use). Typically, the courts are restrictive in accepting such a defence.


Contributed by Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak
Constitutional Tribunal deems information claim mechanism unconstitutional
  • Poland
  • 18 February 2019

The Constitutional Tribunal recently found that the information claim mechanism provided for in the Industrial Property Law does not comply with the Constitution. Following the tribunal's ruling, the scope of the legal mechanisms to obtain information to determine the scale of an IP infringement has been reduced. However, the decision also makes it possible to protect entrepreneurs from the unjustified and unnecessary disclosure of business secrets.

Current search

Refine search