Lee and Li Attorneys at Law updates

Taiwan-Japan patent file wrapper exchange piloted
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 12 April 2021

In 2018 the Taiwan-Japan Relations Association and the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association signed a memorandum of understanding on the exchange of patent file wrappers to facilitate the sharing of file histories and other relevant information sought by applicants and patent examiners between Taiwan and Japan. The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office recently announced the pilot of a shared platform for accessing patent examination documents.

Dispute resolution policy efficiently prevents cybersquatting
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 05 April 2021

'Cybersquatting' is the bad-faith registration of a domain name that contains another party's trademark. Where an unauthorised domain name is registered in a Taiwanese generic top-level domain (ie, with a '.tw' domain name) under a contract with the Taiwan Network Information Centre (TWNIC), the affected party may be able to file a TWNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy proceeding, which is an efficient tool for preventing trademark infringement and cybersquatting.

Draft amendments to Patent Act introduce significant changes to patent remedy system
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 29 March 2021

The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office recently published draft amendments to certain articles of the Patent Act which substantially revise the litigation procedures for patent cases and consolidate the appeal levels. The amendments amount to the biggest change to the Patent Act in recent years. Patent owners and related professionals should pay close attention to the changes to the act and related laws and regulations to understand how their rights and interests may be affected.

Approved characteristics used to assess plant variety right infringement in war of the roses
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 08 March 2021

Article 40 of the Plant Variety and Plant Seed Act provides legal remedies for plant variety rights holders or exclusive licensees whose rights have been infringed. The Taiwan Intellectual Property Court recently rendered a civil judgment that specifically indicates how to determine whether an allegedly infringing plant is an infringing variety.

Protection of photographic works
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 01 March 2021

With the development of technology, cameras and mobile phones now have various built-in shooting modes or parameters that enable photographers to shoot different scenes quickly. Traditionally, photographers would have had to adjust the parameters themselves. Notably, in two recent decisions the IP Court ruled that photographic works taken using built-in shooting modes or parameters can meet the Copyright Act's requirements for creativeness (originality).

Use of geographic name as trademark may constitute passing off
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 22 February 2021

A brand owner filed an invalidation action against the trademark 約克夏茶YORK SHIRETEA and a device mark in respect of services in Class 42 for a violation of the Trademark Act. After examination, the defendant (ie, the IP Office) cancelled the trademark's registration. Dissatisfied, the plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Ministry of Economic Affairs, which was dismissed. The plaintiff then filed an administrative suit with the IP Court.

TIPO holds similarity of trademarked goods not restricted by classification of goods or services in Trademark Act
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 08 February 2021

In the examination stage of trademark dispute cases, how to determine whether the goods or services are similar and the extent of their similarity are important issues. In a recent trademark opposition case, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court (TIPO) clarified the definitions of 'similar goods' and 'similar services'. TIPO further expounded that the classification of goods or services in the Enforcement Rules of the Trademark Act is for the convenience of administrative management and search purposes.

Differences in terminology do not necessarily mean that component lies outside scope of patent
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 01 February 2021

In patent infringement disputes, when the patent at issue is compared with the accused infringing product, it is necessary to first confirm whether both components have the same technical features so as to confirm whether one is a literal reading of the other. In a recent case, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court determined that the two components at issue did not constitute a literal reading and that the accused infringing product did not constitute patent infringement.

TIPO issues Q&A on examination practices of new Patent Act
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 25 January 2021

In 2019 the new Patent Act took effect, setting stricter time limits for parties to propose attack and defence methods in invalidation procedures to avoid delays in and improve the effectiveness of invalidation examinations. Following public confusion, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office recently issued a Q&A on the examination practices of the Patent Act, to provide more detailed guidance on the interpretation and application of relevant provisions in specific cases. This article summarises the guidance.

Patent examination pilot programme for start-ups takes effect
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 18 January 2021

The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office recently announced a patent examination pilot programme for start-ups, effective 1 January 2021. Under the programme, start-ups with research and development capabilities will experience a more active and positive examination process which will enable them to better improve their patent portfolios.

Patent Examination Guidelines amended – requirements for disclosure of specifications and drawings relaxed
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 21 December 2020

The Ministry of Economic Affairs recently announced an amendment to Volume 3 – Design Patent Substantive Examination of the Patent Examination Guidelines. On 1 November 2020 the amended version of the guidelines took effect. The amended guidelines provide applicants with a more flexible filing strategy and a more complete level of protection with regard to the appearance of their designs.

Is commercial success a factor considered in determining non-obviousness of a patent?
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 19 October 2020

A pitfall that is difficult to avoid when determining whether a patent is non-obvious is hindsight bias when comparing a patent with prior art. This is why the Taiwan Patent Examination Guidelines have introduced secondary considerations to determine the non-obviousness of a patent, including 'unexpected results', 'long-felt but unsolved needs', 'overcoming technical prejudice' and 'commercial success'.

Is appearance design of drugs subject to protection under Fair Trade Act?
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 31 August 2020

In a recent case, the IP Court adopted a negative stance on the issue of whether the appearance design of drugs may be regarded as trade dress of goods or services and thus be subject to Article 22(1)(1) of the Fair Trade Act. The drugs involved in this case were prescription drugs that can be obtained only with a physician's prescription. It remains to be seen whether there is any difference in legal application with respect to non-prescription drugs.

Third-party observations can be submitted prior to laying open
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 24 August 2020

Since the inception of laid-open patent applications, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) has allowed any party to provide relevant materials to support rejections of subject patent applications before the examination decision is rendered. Having sustained the foregoing provision for several years, TIPO recently amended the rule by deleting the original restriction that supporting materials may be submitted only after a patent application is laid open.

Taiwan-Japan PPH MOTTAINAI becomes permanently effective
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 27 July 2020

In 2012 Taiwan and Japan signed a patent prosecution highway (PPH) programme to better facilitate patent cooperation. In 2014 the programme (known as the 'PPH MOTTAINAI') was amended to relax a restriction which meant that only search and examination results of the office of first filing were permissible as a reference for the office of second filing. On 1 May 2020 the PPH MOTTAINAI became permanently effective.

Trademark including well-known stage name of professional athlete should be refused registration
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 29 June 2020

According to Article 30-1(13) of the Trademark Act, trademarks containing another person's portrait or well-known name, stage name, pseudonym or alternative name should be refused registration unless said person consents to the application. However, the definition of 'stage names' in Article 30-1(13) remains unclear under current practice. The IP Court recently expressed its view on this issue in an administrative litigation regarding trademark opposition.

Main points of Copyright Act draft amendments
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 18 May 2020

In January 2020 the Intellectual Property Office announced draft amendments to the Copyright Act which aim to address the exploitation of copyrightable works in the era of digital convergence and cloud technology, the regulation of fair use, the reconciliation of rights and the perfection of copyright regulations. This article discusses the main points of the draft amendments.

TIPO releases patent information for COVID-19 clinical trial drugs
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 27 April 2020

Research and development (R&D) efforts for COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment methods are in full swing. To promote and protect the results of this R&D, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) has verified the Taiwanese patent database by comparing it with the COVID-19-related clinical trials currently registered in the US clinical trial database. Further, TIPO has released current Taiwanese patent information regarding COVID-19-related clinical trial drugs for public reference.

New amendments to Trade Secrets Act
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 13 April 2020

In December 2019 the Legislative Yuan passed a third reading of amendments to the Trade Secrets Act, expressly stipulating that any unrecognised foreign juristic person may file a complaint for public prosecution, private prosecution or civil action pursuant to the Trade Secrets Act. In addition to solving inconsistencies in past judicial practice, the amendments establish the Protective Order in Criminal Investigation system.

Provisional execution not required for patent transfer recordation
Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Taiwan
  • 02 March 2020

In disputes relating to the ownership of patent rights, rights holders can petition for a pre-final enforcement order to preserve their rights before a judgment becomes final and irrevocable in addition to requesting the title transfer recordation of the disputed patent. However, in a recent Supreme Court ruling, it was explicitly stated that the pre-final enforcement of a patent transfer recordation was unnecessary and that the enforcement court will reject any such related petitions.

Current search