Competition & Antitrust, Sweden updates

Supreme Court to try limitations on judicial review of admissible evidence
Advokatfirman Lindahl
  • Sweden
  • May 10 2018

Under the Competition Act, claims that a document is covered by legal privilege may be assessed by the courts. However, no equivalent possibility of judicial review exists for documents that allegedly fall outside the scope of dawn raid warrants. The question remains as to whether the lack of judicial review of such decisions is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and EU law.

No damages for margin squeeze in follow-on claim
Advokatfirman Lindahl
  • Sweden
  • January 25 2018

In December 2017 the Svea Court of Appeal dismissed an abuse of dominance damages claim against Telia Company AB. In 2013 Telia was fined for abusing its dominant position in the asymmetric digital subscriber line market by applying a margin squeeze on its competitors. Earlier in 2017 a follow-on claim by telecoms operator Yarps, based on the same infringement, was rejected by the Svea Court of Appeal.

Competition Authority receives greater decision-making powers
Advokatfirman Lindahl
  • Sweden
  • November 02 2017

After years of intense debate, a new government bill will give the Competition Authority greater decision-making powers in relation to notified mergers in Sweden. An official government report states that the authority's decision-making powers should lead to an increased incentive for fast, high-quality decision making and eliminate time losses that might arise as a result of the authority preparing a lawsuit instead of a decision.

Current search