The new Competition Authority president recently completed her first full year in office with impressive results. Since November 2016 the authority has adopted six infringement procedure decisions, one commitment decision and two fining decisions. Further, the transposition of the EU Directive on Antitrust Damages Actions into national law appears to be close to completion. As a result, it seems likely that 2018 will start with the approval of a new legal framework for the private enforcement of competition law.
The Competition Authority recently ended an investigation into the exchange of prospective prices between pork meat producers, meat processors and slaughter houses with no finding of anti-competitive practice. This is the first Competition Authority decision to validate an information exchange scheme involving (but not limited to) competitors. As such, more straightforward guidance from the authority on how this case differs from prior cases and justifies such a benign approach would have been welcomed.
To date, 2017 has been a busy year for the Competition Authority. During the first half of the year, the Competition Authority made 36 dawn raids on companies operating in several economic sectors. Although no details of the dawn raids have been released, the authority has clarified that it gathered evidence concerning cartel activities and other practices concerning the offering of goods and services with a direct impact on the final consumer.
In a significant defeat for the Competition Authority, the Lisbon Court of Appeal has partially reversed a first-instance judgment and repealed the main fine imposed in a margin squeeze case which involved pharmacies' sales data for prescription medication and consumer health products. The decision re-emphasises the autonomy, for antitrust liability purposes, of separate legal parties in the same economic group.
The Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement campaign is a highlight of the Competition Authority's recent advocacy initiatives. The campaign is intended to raise awareness among the state bodies that regularly award public contracts of the most common issues concerning bid rigging in public procurement. It also advises on how to detect illegal practices in the context of public tenders and design tender programmes in a way that inhibits potential collusive tendering.
The Competition Authority recently concluded its antitrust inquiry into an agreement between pharmaceutical companies Teva and AstraZeneca, under which Teva had agreed to withdraw a generic medicine from the Portuguese market. The inquiry's findings are the first to combine competition and IP law in the context of a patent settlement between originator and generic pharmaceutical undertakings.
The Court of Competition, Regulation and Supervision recently upheld a Competition Authority decision regarding an infringement of competition rules through the abuse of a dominant position as a result of a margin squeeze. This case constitutes an important result for the Competition Authority, which has been trying to consolidate its decisional practice in the antitrust field by developing improved response times and delivering more detailed investigations and solid decisions.
Following changes to the Competition Act, judicial challenges to Competition Authority decisions have non-suspensive effect. However, given the often punitive magnitude of fines imposed under the Competition Act, these changes have been criticised for infringing fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The Constitutional Tribunal recently gave its opinion on this issue for the first time.
The Competition Authority recently published its report for 2015, in which it details its activities, main achievements and relevant metrics. According to the report, 2015 was a busy and successful year for the authority in the context of antitrust and merger control. Further, the authority's response time and practice have improved, which is a clear indicator that it is becoming a more effective supervisory body.